Literature DB >> 19861526

Human papillomavirus 16 load and E2/E6 ratio in HPV16-positive women: biomarkers for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia >or=2 in a liquid-based cytology setting?

Gaëlle A V Boulet1, Ina H Benoy, Christophe E Depuydt, Caroline A J Horvath, Marc Aerts, Niel Hens, Annie J Vereecken, Johannes J Bogers.   

Abstract

This retrospective case-control study assessed human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) viral load and E2/E6 ratio as risk markers for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) >or=2 lesions in HPV16-positive women in a routine liquid-based cytology setting. Triplex quantitative PCR for HPV16 E6, E2, and beta-globin was done to determine the HPV16 load and the E2/E6 ratio, as a surrogate marker for integration, for women with a negative histologic endpoint (200 controls: 83 normal histology and 117 CIN1) and women with a >or=CIN2 endpoint (180 cases: 41 CIN2, 122 CIN3, and 17 invasive carcinoma). Our analysis showed a significantly higher HPV16 load in the case group, which was completely attributable to the high viral load of samples with invasive carcinoma as histologic endpoint. There was no significant difference in viral load between the other histologic groups. The E2/E6 ratio proved to be lower for the cases. However, the E2/E6 ratio indicated the presence of HPV integration in a considerable amount of control samples (44.3%), which suggests that HPV integration occurs early in the development of cancer and undermines the clinical value of viral integration. Overall, the intrinsic heterogeneous nature of the cervical cytology samples caused a substantial overlap of the HPV16 load and the E2/E6 ratio between controls and cases, which precludes the determination of cutoff values for risk prediction and hampers the clinical applicability in a cervical screening setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19861526     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  15 in total

1.  Correlation between physical status of human papilloma virus and cervical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Kezhen Li; Xin Jin; Yong Fang; Changyu Wang; Mei Gong; Pingbo Chen; Jia Liu; Dongrui Deng; Jihui Ai
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-01-27

2.  Physical state and viral load as predictive biomarkersfor persistence and progression of HPV16-positive cervical lesions: results from a population based long-term prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Manawapat; Frank Stubenrauch; Rainer Russ; Christian Munk; Susanne Kruger Kjaer; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Human papillomavirus load measured by Linear Array correlates with quantitative PCR in cervical cytology specimens.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Patti E Gravitt; Rodney Long; Mark Schiffman; S Terence Dunn; J Daniel Carreon; Richard A Allen; Munira Gunja; Rosemary E Zuna; Mark E Sherman; Michael A Gold; Joan L Walker; Sophia S Wang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Prospective study of HPV16 viral load and risk of in situ and invasive squamous cervical cancer.

Authors:  Karin Sundström; Alexander Ploner; Lisen Arnheim Dahlström; Juni Palmgren; Joakim Dillner; Hans-Olov Adami; Nathalie Ylitalo; Pär Sparén
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Presence of HPV 16 and HPV 18 in Spermatozoa and Embryos of Mice.

Authors:  Eirini Mastora; Chrysoula Kitsou; Theocharis Evangelou; Athanasios Zikopoulos; Nektaria Zagorianakou; Ioannis Georgiou
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Changes in type-specific human papillomavirus load predict progression to cervical cancer.

Authors:  Christophe E Depuydt; Arnold M Criel; Ina H Benoy; Marc Arbyn; Annie J Vereecken; Johannes J Bogers
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.310

7.  Papillomavirus-Associated Tumor Formation Critically Depends on c-Fos Expression Induced by Viral Protein E2 and Bromodomain Protein Brd4.

Authors:  Maria Delcuratolo; Jasmin Fertey; Markus Schneider; Johanna Schuetz; Natalie Leiprecht; Benjamin Hudjetz; Stephan Brodbeck; Silke Corall; Marcel Dreer; Roxana Michaela Schwab; Martin Grimm; Shwu-Yuan Wu; Frank Stubenrauch; Cheng-Ming Chiang; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Limitations of widely used high-risk human papillomavirus laboratory-developed testing in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Sonya Naryshkin; R Marshall Austin
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2012-11-02

9.  Risk of progression of early cervical lesions is associated with integration and persistence of HPV-16 and expression of E6, Ki-67, and telomerase.

Authors:  Arianna Vega-Peña; Berenice Illades-Aguiar; Eugenia Flores-Alfaro; Esther López-Bayghen; Marco Antonio Leyva-Vázquez; Eduardo Castañeda-Saucedo; Luz Del Carmen Alarcón-Romero
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Human Papillomavirus 16, 18, 31 and 45 viral load, integration and methylation status stratified by cervical disease stage.

Authors:  Luigi Marongiu; Anna Godi; John V Parry; Simon Beddows
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.