Literature DB >> 19861519

Genetic variants in the vitamin d receptor are associated with advanced prostate cancer at diagnosis: findings from the prostate testing for cancer and treatment study and a systematic review.

Lina Chen1, George Davey Smith, David M Evans, Angela Cox, Debbie A Lawlor, Jenny Donovan, Wei Yuan, Ian N M Day, Richard M Martin, Athene Lane, Santi Rodriguez, Michael Davis, Luisa Zuccolo, Simon M Collin, Freddie Hamdy, David Neal, Sarah J Lewis.   

Abstract

Low levels of plasma vitamin D have been implicated as a possible risk factor for both prostate cancer incidence and advanced disease, and recent phase II trials suggest that vitamin D supplementation might delay progression of prostate cancer. Common polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) are associated with VDR activity and are therefore potentially useful proxies for assessing whether vitamin D is causally related to advanced prostate cancer. We genotyped five well-known VDR polymorphisms in 1,604 men with prostate cancer from the Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment study. Our aim was to examine the association between VDR polymorphisms and cancer stage (localized versus advanced) as well as cancer grade (Gleason score <7 versus >or=7). Moreover, we also carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 similar studies. As a result of our meta-analysis, we revealed three polymorphisms, BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI, associated with high Gleason score with an overall summary odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.12 (1.00-1.25; bb versus BB + Bb), 1.25 (1.02-1.53; aa versus AA + Aa), and 0.82 (0.69-0.98; Tt + tt versus TT), respectively. The haplotype analysis revealed that the BsmI (B)-ApaI (A)-TaqI (t) participants compared with BsmI (b)-ApaI (a)-TaqI (T) individuals were less likely to have high Gleason scores (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.00; P(unadjusted) = 0.050; P(adjusted) = 0.014). Our finding provides some support for the hypothesis that low levels of vitamin D may increase the risk of prostate cancer progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19861519     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  34 in total

Review 1.  Lifestyle and dietary factors in the prevention of lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn M Wilson; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Identification of genetic risk associated with prostate cancer using ancestry informative markers.

Authors:  L J Ricks-Santi; V Apprey; T Mason; B Wilson; M Abbas; W Hernandez; S Hooker; M Doura; G Bonney; G Dunston; R Kittles; C Ahaghotu
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphisms are associated with PSA level, Gleason score and prostate cancer risk in African-American men.

Authors:  Emmanuel Y Jingwi; Muneer Abbas; Luisel Ricks-Santi; Danyelle Winchester; Desta Beyene; Agnes Day; Tammey J Naab; Olakunle O Kassim; Georgia M Dunston; Robert L Copeland; Yasmine M Kanaan
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Vitamin D Pathway and Other Related Polymorphisms and Risk of Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Kathleen Torkko; Cathee Till; Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; Xiaoling Song; Jeannette M Schenk; M Scott Lucia; Ulrike Peters; Adrie van Bokhoven; Ian M Thompson; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-02-26

5.  Associations of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D with prostate cancer diagnosis, stage and grade.

Authors:  Rebecca Gilbert; Chris Metcalfe; William D Fraser; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; J Athene Lane; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Hormone response element binding proteins: novel regulators of vitamin D and estrogen signaling.

Authors:  Thomas S Lisse; Martin Hewison; John S Adams
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  Variation in the vitamin D receptor gene is not associated with risk of colorectal cancer in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  David J Hughes; Ivona Hlavatá; Pavel Soucek; Barbara Pardini; Alessio Naccarati; Ludmila Vodickova; Mazda Jenab; Pavel Vodicka
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2011-09

8.  Vitamin D receptor gene variants and clinical outcomes after androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jiunn-Bey Pao; Ying-Pi Yang; Chun-Nung Huang; Shu-Pin Huang; Tzyh-Chyuan Hour; Ta-Yuan Chang; Yu-Hsuan Lan; Te-Ling Lu; Hong-Zin Lee; Shin-Hun Juang; Chao-Yuan Huang; Bo-Ying Bao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Association between vitamin D receptor gene Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Zhu-Chao Zhou; Jie Wang; Zi-Hao Cai; Qun-hua Zhang; Zhen-Xin Cai; Jian-Hua Wu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-07-03

10.  Associations between an obesity related genetic variant (FTO rs9939609) and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Sarah J Lewis; Ali Murad; Lina Chen; George Davey Smith; Jenny Donovan; Tom Palmer; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; J Athene Lane; Michael Davis; Angela Cox; Richard M Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.