Literature DB >> 19861329

Weaknesses, strengths and needs in fertility care according to patients.

Inge W H van Empel1, Willianne L D M Nelen, Eveline T Tepe, Esther A P van Laarhoven, Christianne M Verhaak, Jan A M Kremer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The patients' role in assessing health care quality is increasingly recognized. Measuring patients' specific experiences and needs generates concrete information for care improvement, whereas satisfaction surveys only give an overoptimistic, undifferentiating picture. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate possible weaknesses, strengths and needs in fertility care by measuring patients' specific experiences.
METHODS: Mixed (qualitative and quantitative) methods were used to identify weaknesses, strengths and needs in fertility care. Four focus groups with 21 infertile patients were used for documenting care aspects relevant to patients. The fully transcribed qualitative results were analysed and converted into a 124-item questionnaire, to investigate whether these aspects were regarded as weaknesses, strengths or needs in fertility care. The questionnaire was distributed to 369 eligible couples attending 13 Dutch fertility clinics. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the quantity of the weaknesses, strengths and needs.
RESULTS: Overall, 286 women (78%) and 280 men (76%) completed the questionnaire. Patients experienced many weaknesses in fertility care, mostly regarding emotional support and continuity of care. Respect and autonomy and partner involvement were considered strengths in current care. Furthermore, women expressed their need for more doctors' continuity during their treatment, and couples strongly desired to have free access to their own medical record. The questionnaire's internal consistency and construct validity were sufficient.
CONCLUSIONS: Infertile couples experience strengths, but also many weaknesses and needs in current fertility care. Lack of patient centredness seems to be a major cause herein. Using mixed methods is a sensitive means for identifying these weaknesses and needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19861329     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  20 in total

1.  Complementary and alternative medicine use in infertility: cultural and religious influences in a multicultural Canadian setting.

Authors:  Suzanne C Read; Marie-Eve Carrier; Rob Whitley; Ian Gold; Togas Tulandi; Phyllis Zelkowitz
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.579

2.  Factors associated with early in vitro fertilization treatment discontinuation.

Authors:  Bronwyn S Bedrick; Kelsey Anderson; Darcy E Broughton; Barton Hamilton; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Psychological and social aspects of infertility in men: an overview of the evidence and implications for psychologically informed clinical care and future research.

Authors:  Jane R W Fisher; Karin Hammarberg
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  The Tell me tool: The development and feasibility of a tool for person-centred infertility care.

Authors:  Eva W Verkerk; Ester A Rake; Didi D M Braat; Willianne L D M Nelen; Johanna W M Aarts; Jan A M Kremer
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.318

5.  Increasing and decreasing factors of hope in infertile women with failure in infertility treatment: A phenomenology study.

Authors:  Leili Mosalanejad; Nehle Parandavar; Morteza Gholami; Sareh Abdollahifard
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-02

6.  Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Willings Botha; Natasha Donnolley; Marian Shanahan; Georgina M Chambers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Satisfaction with in vitro fertilization treatment: patients' experiences and professionals' perceptions.

Authors:  Limor Dina Gonen
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-02

8.  Exploration of infertile couples' support requirements: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Jafarzadeh-Kenarsari; Ataollah Ghahiri; Mojtaba Habibi; Ali Zargham-Boroujeni
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-04-21

9.  Experiences of Infertile Women Seeking Assisted Pregnancy in Iran: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Fahimeh Ranjbar; Zahra Behboodi-Moghadam; Leili Borimnejad; Saeed Reza Ghaffari; Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

10.  Infertile men's needs and assessment of fertility care.

Authors:  Randi Sylvest; Jeanette Krogh Fürbringer; Lone Schmidt; Anja Pinborg
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.