Literature DB >> 19860932

Patient position and semi-rigid ureteroscopy outcomes.

Fernando Korkes1, Antonio C Lopes-Neto, Mario H E Mattos, Antonio C L Pompeo, Eric R Wroclawski.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Two positions have been reported for ureteroscopy (URS): dorsal lithotomy (DL) position and dorsal lithotomy position with same side leg slightly extended (DLEL). The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes associated with URS performed with patients in DL vs. DLEL position.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 98 patients treated for ureteral calculi were randomized to either DL or DLEL position during URS, and were prospectively followed. Patients, stone characteristics and operative outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the 98 patients included in the study, 56.1% were men and 43.9% women with a mean age of 42.6 +/- 16.8 years. Forty-eight patients underwent URS in DL position and 50 in DLEL position. Patients' age, mean stone size and location were similar between both groups. Operative time was longer for the DL vs. DLEL group (81.0 vs. 62.0 minutes, p = 0.045), mainly for men (95.2 vs. 63.9 minutes, p = 0.023). Mean fluoroscopy use, complications and success rates were similar between both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Most factors associated with operative outcomes during URS are inherent to patient's condition or devices available at each center, and therefore cannot be changed. However, leg position is a simple factor that can easily be changed, and directly affects operative time during URS. Even though success and complication rates are not related to position, placing the patient in dorsal lithotomy position with an extended leg seems to make the surgery easier and faster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19860932     DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382009000500005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  3 in total

Review 1.  Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on stone technology behind ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan Cloutier; Ken Anson; Guido Giusti; Michael Grasso; Guido Kamphuis; Sven Lahme; Evangelos Liatsikos; Anup Patel; Margaret S Pearle; Luc Valiquette; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Surgical positioning techniques in urology : Tips and tricks].

Authors:  A Miernik; K-D Sievert; T R W Herrmann; C Netsch; J J Rassweiler; H Leyh; J Westphal; A Bachmann; A Häcker; R Homberg; J-T Klein; P J Olbert; D S Schoeb; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  A comparison of antegrade percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones.

Authors:  Hikmet Topaloglu; Nihat Karakoyunlu; Sercan Sari; Hakki Ugur Ozok; Levent Sagnak; Hamit Ersoy
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.