| Literature DB >> 19860917 |
Ana C Espinosa1, Carlos F Arias, Salvador Sánchez-Colón, Marisa Mazari-Hiriart.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacteria used as indicators for pathogenic microorganisms in water are not considered adequate as enteric virus indicators. Surface water from a tropical high-altitude system located in Mexico City that receives rainwater, treated and non-treated wastewater used for irrigation, and groundwater used for drinking, was studied.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19860917 PMCID: PMC2777857 DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-49
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health ISSN: 1476-069X Impact factor: 5.984
Figure 1Percentage of RT-PCR positive samples. Rotavirus (RV), enterovirus (EV) and astrovirus (AST) in water used for irrigation over annual cycles (2001 and 2002). The Astrovirus genome was not detected either of the two warm-rainy seasons, and the genome rotavirus was not detected during the 2002 warm-rainy.
Figure 2Relationship between the occurrence of EV in irrigation waters and temperature. Points represent observed values (1 = presence, 0 = absence), while the continuous curve represents the logit model describing relationship between the probability of occurrence of EV and temperature: P = exp (11.1268 - 0.657*Temperature)/(1 + exp(11.1268 - 0.657*Temperature)).
Figure 3Indicator bacteria in irrigation water. Counts of total coliforms (TC), faecal coliforms (FC) and enterococci (FE) in water used for irrigation over two seasons each year. Bacterial counts were determined by filtration membrane method and standard culture media.
Association of enteric viruses, bacteria and coliphage in irrigation water.
| Coliphages | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positives | ||||
| Microorganisms | n | % | N | % | |
| TC | 1 | 2.5 | 33 | 82.5 | 0.0003 |
| FC | 0 | 0 | 35 | 87.5 | 0.0000 |
| FE | 0 | 0 | 40 | 100 | 0.0000 |
| EV | 3 | 7.5 | 16 | 40 | 0.0182 |
| RV | 7 | 17.5 | 7 | 17.5 | 0.1502 |
| AST | 7 | 17.5 | 2 | 5 | 0.4587 |
Total bacterial counts (CFU/100 mL) for TC, FC and FE in the water source.
| Year/season | TC | FC | FE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | ||||||
| warm-rainy | 0/10 | 0 | 1/10 | 1 | 1/10 | 1 |
| cold-dry | 1/10 | 1 | 0/10 | 0 | 4/10 | 101 |
| 2002 | ||||||
| warm-rainy | 2/10 | 24 | 1/10 | 1 | 7/10 | 370 |
| cold-dry | 4/10 | 404 | 4/10 | 53 | 6/10 | 216 |
+/n positive samples with respect to total number of samples
Physicochemical parameters registered in water samples.
| Parameter | 2001 | 2002 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | 20.77 | 15.26 | 19.90 | 15.15 |
| pH | 7.53 | 7.85 | 7.92 | 7.78 |
| Conductivity μS/cm) | 658.00 | 711.00 | 477.20 | 727.10 |
| Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) | 3.27 | 2.82 | 3.93 | 3.94 |
| Temperature (°C) | 16.86 | 15.83 | 16.02 | 16.41 |
| pH | 6.95 | 6.78 | 7.83 | 7.34 |
| Conductivity (μS/cm) | 379.30 | 315.40 | 463.30 | 293.10 |
| Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) | 3.48 | 4.57 | 3.52 | 3.09 |