Literature DB >> 19860792

Preservation of endothelium nitric oxide release by pulsatile flow cardiopulmonary bypass when compared with continuous flow.

Ettore Lanzarone1, Fabrizio Gelmini, Maddalena Tessari, Tiziano Menon, Hisanori Suzuki, Marina Carini, Maria Laura Costantino, Roberto Fumero, Giovanni Battista Luciani, Giuseppe Faggian.   

Abstract

The aim of this work is to analyze endothelium nitric oxide (NO) release in patients undergoing continuous or pulsatile flow cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Nine patients operated under continuous flow CPB, and nine patients on pulsatile flow CPB were enrolled. Plasma samples were withdrawn for the chemiluminescence detection of nitrite and nitrate. Moreover the cellular component was withdrawn for the detection of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity in the erythrocytes, and an estimation of systemic inflammatory response was carried out. Significant reduction in the intraoperative concentration with respect to the preoperative was observed only under continuous flow CPB for both nitrite and NO(x) (nitrite + nitrate) concentration (P = 0.010 and P = 0.016, respectively). Significant difference in intraoperative nitrite concentration was also observed between the groups (P = 0.012). Finally, erythrocytes showed a certain endothelial NOS activity, which did not differ between the groups, and no differences in the inflammatory response were pointed out. The significant reduction of NO(2)(-) concentration under continuous perfusion revealed the strong connection among perfusion modality, endothelial NO release, and plasmatic nitrite concentration. The similar erythrocyte eNOS activity between the groups revealed that the differences in blood NO metabolites are mainly ascribable to the endothelium release.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19860792     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00888.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  3 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of renal benefits to pulsatile perfusion in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Alicia Sievert; Joseph Sistino
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Arterial pressure and cerebral blood flow variability: friend or foe? A review.

Authors:  Caroline A Rickards; Yu-Chieh Tzeng
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Efficacy of Pulsatile Flow Perfusion in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Hemodynamic Energy and Vascular Reactivity.

Authors:  Mikhail Dodonov; Francesco Onorati; Giovanni Battista Luciani; Alessandra Francica; Maddalena Tessari; Tiziano Menon; Leonardo Gottin; Aldo Domenico Milano; Giuseppe Faggian
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.