Literature DB >> 19858751

Alterations in speed of squat movement and the use of accommodated resistance among college athletes training for power.

Matthew R Rhea1, Joseph G Kenn, Bryan M Dermody.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of heavy/slow movements and variable resistance training on peak power and strength development. Forty-eight National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletes (age: 21.4 +/- 2.1 years, all men) were recruited for this 12-week training intervention study. Maximum strength and jumping power were assessed before and after the training program. Athletes were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 training groups: heavy resistance/slow movement (Slow), lighter resistance and fast movement (Fast), or fast movements with accommodated resistance (FACC). All training groups performed similar training programs comprising free weight resistance training with lower-body compound exercises. The only difference among the training interventions was the speed at which subjects performed the squat exercise and the use of bands (Slow group: 0.2-0.4 meters/second; Fast group: 0.6-0.8 meters/second; FACC group trained 0.6-0.8 meters/second with the addition of accommodated resistance in the form of large elastic bands). Post-test data revealed a significant difference between power improvements between the Slow and FACC groups (p = 0.02). Percent increases and effect sizes (ES) demonstrated a much greater treatment effect in the FACC group (17.8%, ES = 1.06) with the Fast group (11.0%, ES = 0.80) adapting more than the Slow group (4.8%, ES = 0.28). The FACC and Slow groups improved strength comparatively (FACC: 9.44%, ES = 1.10; Slow: 9.59%, ES = 1.08). The Fast group improved strength considerably less, 3.20% with an effect size of only 0.38. Variable resistance training with elastic bands appears to provide greater performance benefits with regard to peak force and peak power than heavy, slow resistance exercise. Sports conditioning professionals can utilize bands, and high-speed contractions, to increase power development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19858751     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3e1b6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

1.  A mathematical model of neuromuscular adaptation to resistance training and its application in a computer simulation of accommodating loads.

Authors:  Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  ECCENTRIC AND CONCENTRIC JUMPING PERFORMANCE DURING AUGMENTED JUMPS WITH ELASTIC RESISTANCE: A META-ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Saied Jalal Aboodarda; Phillip A Page; David George Behm
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11

3.  The Optimal Load for Maximal Power Production During Lower-Body Resistance Exercises: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco A Soriano; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Matthew R Rhea; Pedro J Marín
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Foam Rolling and Joint Distraction with Elastic Band Training Performed for 5-7 Weeks Respectively Improve Lower Limb Flexibility.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Yann Kerautret; Florian Queyrel; William Schobb; Franck Di Rienzo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Effectiveness of accommodation and constant resistance training on maximal strength and power in trained athletes.

Authors:  Jalil Ataee; Majid S Koozehchian; Richard B Kreider; Li Zuo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Understanding and Overcoming the Sticking Point in Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Justin Kompf; Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Bilateral back squat strength is increased during a 3-week undulating resistance training program with and without variable resistance in DIII collegiate football players.

Authors:  Jason Sawyer; Paul Higgins; Paul A Cacolice; Troy Doming
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  Effects of Variable-Resistance Training Versus Constant-Resistance Training on Maximum Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yiguan Lin; Yangyang Xu; Feng Hong; Junbo Li; Weibing Ye; Mallikarjuna Korivi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Effects of chains squat training with different chain load ratio on the explosive strength of young basketball players' lower limbs.

Authors:  Dongting Jiang; Gang Xu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  The Effects of 24 weeks of Resistance Training with Simultaneous Elastic and Free Weight Loading on Muscular Performance of Novice Lifters.

Authors:  Todd C Shoepe; David A Ramirez; Robert J Rovetti; David R Kohler; Hawley C Almstedt
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.193

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.