PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is important to assess 'radiosensitivity' in patients suspected of immunodeficiency because underlying DNA double strand break (DSB) repair defects have considerable impact on V(D)J recombination, class switching and lymphocyte maturation, leading to increased infections and cancer risk. In addition, the phenotype of 'radiosensitivity' may identify patients with increased toxicity to radiation and chemotherapeutic agents and could impact upon their preparation for stem cell transplantation. To date, the gold standard for evaluating 'radiosensitivity' has been the colony-survival assay (CSA), which reflects the efficiency of DNA repair of DSBs as it impacts upon replication and cell survival. Other methods measure other aspects of DNA repair; however, their limited specificity often leads to false negatives for predicting 'radiosensitivity', especially clinical radiosensitivity. Lastly, clinical awareness of an overarching syndrome of DSB repair disorders, XCIND, could help to raise diagnostic levels of suspicion and, thereby, identify additional patients with new forms of immunodeficiency, cancer susceptibility and radiosensitivity. RECENT FINDINGS: Within the past year, three new radiosensitivity disorders of DSB repair have been described, involving deficiencies of RNF168, RAD50, and DNA-PKcs. These are truly translational advances because they validate laboratory models and allow new patients to be identified. SUMMARY: Recognizing compromised genome stability is important but difficult. We review the evidence for correlations between DSB repair, abnormal colony formation, clinical radiosensitivity and other laboratory methods.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is important to assess 'radiosensitivity' in patients suspected of immunodeficiency because underlying DNA double strand break (DSB) repair defects have considerable impact on V(D)J recombination, class switching and lymphocyte maturation, leading to increased infections and cancer risk. In addition, the phenotype of 'radiosensitivity' may identify patients with increased toxicity to radiation and chemotherapeutic agents and could impact upon their preparation for stem cell transplantation. To date, the gold standard for evaluating 'radiosensitivity' has been the colony-survival assay (CSA), which reflects the efficiency of DNA repair of DSBs as it impacts upon replication and cell survival. Other methods measure other aspects of DNA repair; however, their limited specificity often leads to false negatives for predicting 'radiosensitivity', especially clinical radiosensitivity. Lastly, clinical awareness of an overarching syndrome of DSB repair disorders, XCIND, could help to raise diagnostic levels of suspicion and, thereby, identify additional patients with new forms of immunodeficiency, cancer susceptibility and radiosensitivity. RECENT FINDINGS: Within the past year, three new radiosensitivity disorders of DSB repair have been described, involving deficiencies of RNF168, RAD50, and DNA-PKcs. These are truly translational advances because they validate laboratory models and allow new patients to be identified. SUMMARY: Recognizing compromised genome stability is important but difficult. We review the evidence for correlations between DSB repair, abnormal colony formation, clinical radiosensitivity and other laboratory methods.
Authors: Timothy J Vece; Marc G Schecter; Richard A Gatti; Rashmi Tunuguntla; Christine Kim Garcia; Claire Langston; Megan K Dishop; Robert H Moore; Leland L Fan Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Matthew Medeiros; Xinghui Zheng; Petr Novak; Shawn M Wnek; Vivian Chyan; Claudia Escudero-Lourdes; A Jay Gandolfi Journal: Toxicology Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Shareef A Nahas; Robert Davies; Francesca Fike; Kotoka Nakamura; Liutao Du; Refik Kayali; Nathan T Martin; Patrick Concannon; Richard A Gatti Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Majed J Dasouki; Gerald H Lushington; Karine Hovanes; James Casey; Mereceds Gorre Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Gerard Adams; Olga A Martin; Daniel E Roos; Pavel N Lobachevsky; Andrew E Potter; Andrew C Zacest; Eva Bezak; William M Bonner; Roger F Martin; Trevor Leong Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 6.280