Literature DB >> 19858085

Characteristics of cancer patients using homeopathy compared with those in conventional care: a cross-sectional study.

C Guethlin1, H Walach, J Naumann, H-H Bartsch, M Rostock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are only few studies on cancer patients who are treated in complementary and alternative medicine clinics and comparing them with patients in conventional care. We will present the comparison of characteristics of two patient cohorts: one was treated in a homeopathic cancer care clinic and one was treated in a conventional oncology care (CC) outpatient clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six-hundred and forty-seven patients were included in this cross-sectional cohort study and had to fill in questionnaires [health-related quality of life (QoL) (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale), depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory) and expectancies toward treatment]. Clinical data were extracted from medical records. This study presents the comparison of both cohorts.
RESULTS: Patients in the homeopathy cohort are younger, better educated and more often employed than patients in the CC cohort. The most pronounced differences indicate longer disease histories and different diagnostic and clinical pretreatment variables. Despite the clinical differences, QoL as well as anxiety, depression and fatigue was similar in both the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Homeopathic treatment is sought by cancer patients at a different phase during the course of the disease, which has particular implications for research. However, expectancies toward the benefit of the treatment as well as QoL data are similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19858085     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  7 in total

Review 1.  Great expectations: what do patients using complementary and alternative medicine hope for?

Authors:  E Ernst; S K Hung
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  [Importance of complementary medicine approaches for patients with prostate cancer].

Authors:  K M Gschwendtner; G Klein; C Güthlin; C Holmberg; M Horneber; J Weis
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Dose-effect study of Gelsemium sempervirens in high dilutions on anxiety-related responses in mice.

Authors:  Paolo Magnani; Anita Conforti; Elisabetta Zanolin; Marta Marzotto; Paolo Bellavite
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Prevalence of the Use of Herbal Medicines among Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  John Baptist Asiimwe; Prakash B Nagendrappa; Esther C Atukunda; Mauda M Kamatenesi; Grace Nambozi; Casim U Tolo; Patrick E Ogwang; Ahmed M Sarki
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Classical homeopathy in the treatment of cancer patients--a prospective observational study of two independent cohorts.

Authors:  Matthias Rostock; Johannes Naumann; Corina Guethlin; Lars Guenther; Hans H Bartsch; Harald Walach
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  The development of tumours under a ketogenic diet in association with the novel tumour marker TKTL1: A case series in general practice.

Authors:  Natalie Jansen; Harald Walach
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer care: results of a nationwide multicenter survey in Korea.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Shin; So Young Kim; Boyoung Park; Jae-Hyun Park; Jin Young Choi; Hong Gwan Seo; Jong-Hyock Park
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 2.629

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.