BACKGROUND: Avoidance of steroid therapy after solid-organ transplantation has become a major challenge. Corticosteroid (CS)-free maintenance immunosuppression not only eliminates the well-known adverse effects but also may improve long-term outcome. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a CS-free regimen of tacrolimus (Tac) in combination with daclizumab (Dac) induction therapy provides adequate coverage after orthotopic liver transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This 6-year, single-center, retrospective study included 25 liver transplant recipients randomized to aTac/CS regimen (n = 18) vs a Tac/Dac regimen (n = 7) according to the protocol of the MASTER (Monoclonal Antibodies vs STERoids) Study. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in patient and graft survival between treatment arms: 94.4% in the Tac/CS group vs 71.4% in the Tac/Dac group. The incidence of biopsy-proved acute rejection episodes was 23.5% in the Tac/CS group vs 14.3% in the Tac/Dac group (P = NS). Total duration of hospitalization did not differ significantly between groups: 46.5 days in the Tac/CS group vs 73.9 days in the Tac/Dac group. Liver function as estimated using serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activity and bilirubin concentration, was not significantly different between the groups during 5 years posttransplantation. However, after 6 years, alanine aminotransferase activity was significantly greater in the Tac/Dac group compared with the Tac/CS group. CONCLUSIONS: A CS-free regimen of Tac/Dac is as effective as Tac/Cs in achieving good patient and graft survival. However, no substantial benefits insofar as the safety of Tac/Dac therapy were evident during long-term follow-up.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Avoidance of steroid therapy after solid-organ transplantation has become a major challenge. Corticosteroid (CS)-free maintenance immunosuppression not only eliminates the well-known adverse effects but also may improve long-term outcome. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a CS-free regimen of tacrolimus (Tac) in combination with daclizumab (Dac) induction therapy provides adequate coverage after orthotopic liver transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This 6-year, single-center, retrospective study included 25 liver transplant recipients randomized to a Tac/CS regimen (n = 18) vs a Tac/Dac regimen (n = 7) according to the protocol of the MASTER (Monoclonal Antibodies vs STERoids) Study. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in patient and graft survival between treatment arms: 94.4% in the Tac/CS group vs 71.4% in the Tac/Dac group. The incidence of biopsy-proved acute rejection episodes was 23.5% in the Tac/CS group vs 14.3% in the Tac/Dac group (P = NS). Total duration of hospitalization did not differ significantly between groups: 46.5 days in the Tac/CS group vs 73.9 days in the Tac/Dac group. Liver function as estimated using serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activity and bilirubin concentration, was not significantly different between the groups during 5 years posttransplantation. However, after 6 years, alanine aminotransferase activity was significantly greater in the Tac/Dac group compared with the Tac/CS group. CONCLUSIONS: A CS-free regimen of Tac/Dac is as effective as Tac/Cs in achieving good patient and graft survival. However, no substantial benefits insofar as the safety of Tac/Dac therapy were evident during long-term follow-up.
Authors: Shawn J Pelletier; Satish N Nadig; David D Lee; John B Ammori; Michael J Englesbe; Randall S Sung; John C Magee; Robert J Fontana; Jeffrey D Punch Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Jinyang Gu; Xingyu Wu; Lei Lu; Shu Zhang; Jianling Bai; Jun Wang; Jun Li; Yitao Ding Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 6.047