| Literature DB >> 19857267 |
Naomi Eidelman1, Alan Boyde, Andrew J Bushby, Peter G T Howell, Jirun Sun, Dale E Newbury, Frederick W Miller, Pamela G Robey, Lisa G Rider.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19857267 PMCID: PMC2787294 DOI: 10.1186/ar2841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Res Ther ISSN: 1478-6354 Impact factor: 5.156
Clinical characteristics of myositis patients with calcinosis samples and the methods used to characterize the specimens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calc1 | FTIR-RM qBSE SEM/SDD-EDS PLM | Elbow | JDM | 15.5 years | Hispanic | Male | 5.8 years | 2-3 months | Methylprednisolone, cyclosporine, azathioprine, alendronate, ibuprofen |
| Calc2 | FTIR-RM qBSE SEM/SDD-EDS PLM, μCT | Toe | JPM | 5.4 years | Black | Male | 2 years | 12 months | Prednisone, cyclosporine, rofecoxib, calcium |
| Calc3 | qBSE PLM | Biceps | JDM | 11.9 years | Caucasian | Female | 4.5 years | 9 months | Prednisone, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, probenecid |
| Calc4 | qBSE PLM | Hamstring | JPM | 16.8 years | Caucasian | Female | 4.9 years | > 3 years | Alendronate, celecoxib, diltiazem |
| Calc6 | qBSE PLM | Right buttock | DM | 56 years | Korean | Female | 4.9 years | 6 months | Prednisone |
| Calc7 * | FTIR-RM XRD, μCT PLM | Elbow and finger | DM | 50 years | Caucasian | Female | 12 years | Unknown | Prednisone, methotrexate, alendronate, valdecoxib |
| Calc8 | FTIR-RM XRD, μCT PLM | Shoulder | JDM | 49 years | Caucasian | Female | 30 years | 27 years | Nifedipine |
| Calc10 | FTIR-RM PLM | Thigh | JDM | 12 years | Caucasian | Female | 4 years | 3 months | Prednisone, methotrexate, myocophenolate mofetil, alendronate, colchicine, folic acid |
Specimens Calc5 and Calc9 were not included in this study. *post-mortem sample DM = dermatomyositis; FTIR-RM = Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy in reflectance mode; JDM = juvenile dermatomyositis; JPM = juvenile polymyositis; PLM = polarized light microscopy; qBSE = quantitative backscattered electron; SEM/SDD-EDS = scanning electron microscopy/silicon drift detector energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry; μCT = X-ray micro-computed tomography; XRD = X-ray diffraction.
Figure 1Specimen Calc2. (a) Optical image. (b) Visual map of the surface of the cut face after embedding and polishing. (c and d) Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy in reflectance mode (FTIR-RM) protein and mineral maps (area under the amide and PO4 peaks, respectively) obtained from the whole specimen with 80 × 80 μm spatial resolution (SR). (e and f) FTIR-RM protein and mineral maps obtained from the boxed regions in (c) and (d) with 40 × 40 μm SR. (g) X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) 3D projection images rotated around the same plane that was mapped with FTIR-RM, silicon drift detector energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/SDD-EDS) and quantitative backscattered electron imaging. (h) The cyan boxed region of the FTIR-RM mineral map (f) that was subsequently mapped with SEM/SDD-EDS. (i) SEM/SDD-EDS P, Ca, Na and Mg maps of the same region that was mapped before with FTIR-RM (h). A smaller size scale bar (100 μm) is shown in the P map to emphasize the small dimensions of many of the tiny calcified nodules.
Figure 2Specimen Calc1. (a and b) Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy in reflectance mode (FTIR-RM) protein and mineral maps, respectively, obtained from the whole specimen with 200 × 200 μm spatial resolution (SR). (c and d) FTIR-RM protein and mineral maps obtained from the black boxed regions in (a) and (b) with 80 × 80 μm SR. (e) FTIR-RM mineral map obtained from the cyan boxed region in (d) with 40 × 40 μm SR. Blue is the largest area under the related peaks and red is the lowest in the FTIR-RM maps. The individual size scale bars appear on the images and the maps. (f) Silicon drift detector energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/SDD-EDS) Mg, Na, P and Ca maps of the green boxed region in (e). (g) SEM/SDD-EDS Mg, Na, P and Ca maps of the brown boxed region in (e). The size scale bars in all the SEM/SDD-EDS maps in (f) and (g) are the same as in (e) (1 mm). (h) SEM/SDD-EDS Ca map of the purple boxed region in (e) and in the Ca map in (g), obtained with higher magnification.
Figure 3Specimen Calc10. (a to c) Images of the top of the specimen as received, after freeze drying, embedding and first polishing, respectively. (d to f) Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy in reflectance mode (FTIR-RM) protein and mineral maps and visual map, respectively, of the first exposed plane. (g to i) FTIR-RM protein and mineral maps and visual map, respectively, of the second plane. (j and k) Images of the bottom of the specimen as received and after freeze drying, respectively. (l to n) Visual map and FTIR-RM protein and mineral maps, respectively, of the bottom after embedding and polishing. The distance between the second polished plane (i) and the shaved bottom (l) is 1.8 mm. All FTIR-RM maps were obtained with 180 × 180 μm spatial resolution (SR). Blue is the largest area under the related peaks and red is the lowest in the FTIR-RM maps. The individual size scale bars appear on the images and the maps.
Figure 4Specimen Calc7. (a and b) Images of the top of the specimen as received and after freeze drying, respectively. (c to f) X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) 3D projection image, visual and Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy in reflectance mode (FTIR-RM) protein and mineral maps of the top, respectively, after embedding and polishing. * indicates the same exposed surfaces in the 3D μCT image (c) and the visual map (d). (g and h) Images of the cut cross section of the specimen as received and after freeze drying, respectively. (i to l) μCT 3D projection image, visual and FTIR-RM protein and mineral maps of the cut cross section, respectively, after embedding and polishing. The distance between the (d) polished top and the (j) polished cut cross section is 3.4 mm. All FTIR-RM maps were obtained with 180 × 180 μm spatial resolution (SR). Blue is the largest area under the related peaks and red is the lowest in the FTIR-RM maps. Blue arrows in G and K point to the surrounding tissue. The individual size scale bars appear on the images and the maps.
Figure 5Specimen Calc8. (a) Bottom as received. (b and c) Cut face before and after freeze drying. (d) Visual map of the cut face after embedding and polishing. (e) Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy in reflectance mode (FTIR-RM) protein maps obtained with (panel 1) 200 × 200 μm and (panel 2) 40 × 40 μm spatial resolution (SR). (f) FTIR-RM mineral maps obtained with (panel 1) 200 × 200 μm and (panel 2) 40 × 40 μm SR. Blue is the largest area under the related peaks and red is the lowest in the FTIR-RM maps. (g, panel 1) X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) 2D images obtained at various distances from the bottom of the embedded specimen. (panels 2 and 3) μCT 3D projection images rotated around the same plane as that mapped with the FTIR-RM. The individual size scale bars appear on the images and the maps.
qBSE, FTIR-RM, SEM/SDD-EDS and XRD results obtained from various calcified tissues, calcinosis samples and synthetic apatites
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enamel | |||||||||
| Dentin | |||||||||
| Calcified cartilage | |||||||||
| Bone | |||||||||
| Calc1 | |||||||||
| Calc2 | |||||||||
| Calc2 | |||||||||
| Calc2 | |||||||||
| Calc3** | |||||||||
| Calc4** | |||||||||
| Dentin, Fig 7a | 10.5 | 9.6 | |||||||
| Bone, Fig 7a | 7.4 | 13.5 | |||||||
| Calc1, High Prot | 11.8 | 8.5 | 62.7 | ||||||
| Calc1, Fig 7a | 19.4 | 5.2 | 38.1 | ||||||
| Calc2, Fig 7a | 27.8 | 3.6 | 26.6 | ||||||
| Calc10, Fig 7a | 51.0 | 2.0 | 14.5 | ||||||
| Calc7, Fig 7a | 30.6 | 3.3 | 24.2 | ||||||
| Calc8, Fig 7a | 162.3 | 0.6 | 4.6 | ||||||
| % | % | MR | % | % | % | % | % | ||
| Calc1-1: | Average | 39.4 | 18.3 | 1.66 | 0.60 | 1.28 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| SD | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.01 | ||
| Calc1-2: | Average | 39.8 | 18.2 | 1.69 | 0.62 | 1.07 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| SD | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.01 | ||
| Calc2: | Average | 39.1 | 18.5 | 1.63 | 0.53 | 1.16 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| SD | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
| Phys Apatite | 2.50 | 1.30 | |||||||
| Dentin | 1.99 | 1.03 | |||||||
| Bone | 1.93 | ||||||||
| Calc7-Powder | 3.76 | 1.95 | |||||||
| Calc7-Polished | 4.10 | 2.13 | |||||||
| Calc8-Polished | 4.85 | 2.52 | |||||||
| Enamel | 3.53 | 1.83 | |||||||
| OHAp | 5.95 | 3.09 | |||||||
W = whole image; CE = calcified element; * Figure 5f; ** qBSE images in Figure 7c; HC = highly calcified regions (> 2.60 g/ml).
n = 1024 pixels for qBSE analyses of all calcified tissues and Calc1 and Calc2 images.
% = weight %; MR = molar ratio.
FTIR-RM = Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy in reflectance mode; FWHM = full width at one half the maximum height; qBSE = quantitative backscattered electron; SEM/SDD-EDS = scanning electron microscopy/silicon drift detector energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry; XRD = X-ray diffraction.
Figure 6qBSE images. (a) Normal rabbit molar tooth. En = enamel; C = cementum; Den = dentin. (b) Human iliac crest. CC = calcified cartilage; B = bone. (c) Tiled image of the whole cross section of Calc3. The arrow indicates the region from where the nanoindentation measurements were obtained. (d and e) High magnification of vastly mineralized areas in specimens Calc2 and Calc3. The 'black holes' where no mineral was deposited are adipocyte 'fat'(Ad). (f) Higher magnification of the largest particle in (d). (g) High magnification of poorly mineralized region in Calc3. The arrow indicates collagen fiber bundles and the asterisk indicates smooth muscles. (h and i) Highly mineralized nodules in Calc 4. The arrows in h are pointed towards incremental growth lines that indicate waves of calcification. (j and k) Tiled images of the whole cross sections of Calc4 and Calc6. The mineral density (MD) is the lowest in the dark blue regions and the highest in the light gray regions, as in the enamel in (a) in all color images. A lighter gray shade represents higher MD in the gray scale images. The individual size scale bars appear on each image.
Figure 7Bright field and polarized light microscopy. (a, f and h) Bright field and (b to e and g) polarized light microscopy of (a to d and h) Calc3 and (e to g) Calc7. a and b are the same fields showing small mineralized nodules (arrows) interspersed within a collagenous matrix as illuminated by polarized light (asterisks in b and c). In some cases, the nodules are devoid of collagen (arrow heads in b), and in other cases, wisps of collagen can be detected by the polarized light (arrows in b and c). In other areas (d), adipocytes (A), which are usually surrounded by a delicate lattice visualized by polarized light (black arrows), a lack of polarization surrounding adipocytes (white arrows) near areas of mineral (M) is noted. In areas of mineral that are completely encapsulated by a collagenous matrix (e, white arrows), mineral was found to be completely devoid of collagen as demonstrated by the lack of polarization. f and g are the same fields. Areas of woven bone-like material (WB in g) were found within acellular lakes of mineral (M), with cells embedded within the matrix (arrows in f). Occasionally, hematopoietic tissue (HP in h) appeared in close proximity to blood vessels (BV) and mineral (M).
Figure 8FTIR-RM spectra, XRD patterns, qBSE and stiffness maps and elastic modulus results. (a) Representative Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy in reflectance mode (FTIR-RM) spectra extracted from the maps of Calc1, Calc2, Calc7, Calc8 and Calc10 compared with these of bone, dentin and enamel specimens, and to pressed pellets of physiological apatite and highly crystallized hydroxyapatite. (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of powder from Calc7, of the cross sections of Calc7 and Calc8 compared with those obtained from powders of bone, dentin, enamel, physiological apatite and highly crystallized hydroxyapatite. (c) quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBSE) images and matching stiffness maps obtained from Calc3 and Calc4. The darkest purple represents the highest stiffness and the lightest purple the lowest. (d) Degree of stiffness (elastic modulus) versus the mineral density (MD) measured at the same locations for Calc3 (square) and Calc4 (triangle). Colored data points correspond to data from the dark red, red and pink areas of the qBSE images in c. Hollow symbols correspond to all of the other colored areas in c.