Literature DB >> 19857026

Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.

Shana K Carpenter1.   

Abstract

The current study explored the elaborative retrieval hypothesis as an explanation for the testing effect: the tendency for a memory test to enhance retention more than restudying. In particular, the retrieval process during testing may activate elaborative information related to the target response, thereby increasing the chances that activation of any of this information will facilitate later retrieval of the target. In a test of this view, participants learned cue-target pairs, which were strongly associated (e.g., Toast: Bread) or weakly associated (e.g., Basket: Bread), through either a cued recall test (Toast: _____) or a restudy opportunity (Toast: Bread). A final test requiring free recall of the targets revealed that tested items were retained better than restudied items, and although strong cues facilitated recall of tested items initially, items recalled from weak cues were retained better over time, such that this advantage was eliminated or reversed at the time of the final test. Restudied items were retained at similar rates on the final test regardless of the strength of the cue-target relationship. These results indicate that the activation of elaborative information-which would occur to a greater extent during testing than restudying--may be one mechanism that underlies the testing effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19857026     DOI: 10.1037/a0017021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  60 in total

1.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.

Authors:  Barbie J Huelser; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?

Authors:  Phillip J Grimaldi; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

3.  Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

4.  Enhancing visuospatial learning: the benefit of retrieval practice.

Authors:  Sean H K Kang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

5.  Does test-enhanced learning transfer for triple associates?

Authors:  Steven C Pan; Carol M Wong; Zachary E Potter; Jonathan Mejia; Timothy C Rickard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

6.  Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Practice makes transfer of motor skills imperfect.

Authors:  Arnaud Boutin; Arnaud Badets; Robin N Salesse; Udo Fries; Stefan Panzer; Yannick Blandin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-14

8.  Effects of testing on learning of functions.

Authors:  Sean H K Kang; Mark A McDaniel; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

9.  Delaying feedback by three seconds benefits retention of face-name pairs: the role of active anticipatory processing.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Edward Vul
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

10.  Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing.

Authors:  Ainat Pansky; Einat Tenenboim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.