Literature DB >> 19856424

Body size and human energy requirements: Reduced mass-specific total energy expenditure in tall adults.

Steven B Heymsfield1, Angelo Pietrobelli.   

Abstract

Mammalian resting energy expenditure (REE) increases as approximately weight(0.75) while mass-specific REE scales as approximately weight(-0.25). Energy needs for replacing resting losses are thus less relative to weight (W) in large compared with small mammals, a classic observation with biological implications. Human weight scales as approximately height(2) and tall adults thus have a greater weight than their short counterparts. However, it remains unknown if mass-specific energy requirements are less in tall adults; allometric models linking total energy expenditure (TEE) and weight with height (H) are lacking. We tested the hypothesis that mass-specific energy requirements scale inversely to height in adults by evaluating TEE (doubly labeled water) data collected by the National Academy of Sciences. Activity energy expenditure (AEE) was calculated from TEE, REE (indirect calorimetry), and estimated diet-induced energy expenditure. Main analyses focused on nonmorbidly obese subjects < or =50 yrs of age with non-negative AEE values (n = 404), although results were directionally similar for all samples. Allometric models, including age as a covariate, revealed significantly (P < 0.05) greater REE, AEE, and TEE as a function of height (range H(1.5-1.7)) in both men and women. TEE/W scaled negatively to height ( approximately H(-0.7), P < 0.01) with predicted mass-specific TEE (kcal/kg/d) at +/-2 SD for US height lower in tall compared with short men (40.3 vs. 46.5) and women (37.7 vs. 42.7). REE/W also scaled negatively to height in men (P < 0.001) and women (P < 0.01). Results were generally robust across several different analytic strategies. These observations reveal previously unforeseen associations between human stature and energy requirements that have implications for modeling efforts and provide new links to mammalian biology as a whole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19856424     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  6 in total

1.  Scaling of adult human bone and skeletal muscle mass to height in the US population.

Authors:  Steven B Heymsfield; Phoenix Hwaung; Fernando Ferreyro-Bravo; Moonseong Heo; Diana M Thomas; John M Schuna
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.937

2.  Longitudinal analysis of resting energy expenditure and body mass composition in physically active children and adolescents.

Authors:  Edyta Łuszczki; Anna Bartosiewicz; Maciej Kuchciak; Katarzyna Dereń; Łukasz Oleksy; Olga Adamska; Artur Mazur
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.567

3.  Adult energy requirements predicted from doubly labeled water.

Authors:  Andrew Plucker; Diana M Thomas; Nick Broskey; Corby K Martin; Dale Schoeller; Robin Shook; Steven B Heymsfield; James A Levine; Leanne A Redman
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.551

4.  Obese individuals do not underreport dietary intake to a greater extent than nonobese individuals when data are allometrically-scaled.

Authors:  Sally P Waterworth; Catherine J Kerr; Christopher J McManus; Rianne Costello; Gavin R H Sandercock
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Modeling body mass variation: incorporating social influence into calculations of caloric intake and energy expenditure.

Authors:  Ana María Hernández-Hernández; Rodrigo Huerta-Quintanilla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Weight-HbA1c-insulin-glucose model for describing disease progression of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S Choy; M C Kjellsson; M O Karlsson; W de Winter
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.