Literature DB >> 1985608

Expanded Clinical Evaluation of Lovastatin (EXCEL) study results. I. Efficacy in modifying plasma lipoproteins and adverse event profile in 8245 patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia.

R H Bradford1, C L Shear, A N Chremos, C Dujovne, M Downton, F A Franklin, A L Gould, M Hesney, J Higgins, D P Hurley.   

Abstract

In the Expanded Clinical Evaluation of Lovastatin (EXCEL) Study, a multicenter, double-blind, diet- and placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of lovastatin in 8245 patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or lovastatin at a dosage of 20 mg once daily, 40 mg once daily, 20 mg twice daily, or 40 mg twice daily for 48 weeks. Lovastatin produced sustained, dose-related (P less than .001) changes as follows (for dosages of 20 to 80 mg/d): decreased low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level (24% to 40%), increased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level (6.6% to 9.5%), decreased total cholesterol level (17% to 29%), and decreased triglyceride level (10% to 19%). The National Cholesterol Education Program's low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level goal of less than 4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) was achieved by 80% to 96% of patients, while the less than 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) goal was achieved by 38% to 83% of patients. The difference between lovastatin and placebo in the incidence of clinical adverse experiences requiring discontinuation was small, ranging from 1.2% at 20 mg twice daily to 1.9% at 80 mg/d. Successive transaminase level elevations greater than three times the upper limit of normal were observed in 0.1% of patients receiving placebo and 20 mg/d of lovastatin, increasing to 0.9% in those receiving 40 mg/d and 1.5% in those receiving 80 mg/d of lovastatin (P less than .001 for trend). Myopathy, defined as muscle symptoms with a creatine kinase elevation greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal, was found in only one patient (0.1%) receiving 40 mg once daily and four patients (0.2%) receiving 80 mg/d of lovastatin. Thus, lovastatin, when added after an adequate trial of a prudent diet, is a highly effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1985608     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.151.1.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  70 in total

Review 1.  Statins and bones.

Authors:  M H Moghadasian; J J Frohlich
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Safety profiles for the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: treatment and trust.

Authors:  M H Davidson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Jaundice due to suspected statin hepatotoxicity: a case series.

Authors:  Ottar M Bergmann; Gudjon Kristjansson; Jon G Jonasson; Einar S Björnsson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Conceptual foundations of the UCSD Statin Study: a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of statins on cognition, behavior, and biochemistry.

Authors:  Beatrice Alexandra Golomb; Michael H Criqui; Halbert White; Joel E Dimsdale
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-01-26

Review 5.  Comparing HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

Authors:  Peter H Jones
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Should clofibrate still be prescribed?

Authors:  M G Dunnigan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-15

7.  Coronary heart disease.

Authors:  T Fooks; S Tavare
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Influence of age and gender on the plasma profiles of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitory activity following multiple doses of lovastatin and simvastatin.

Authors:  H Cheng; J D Rogers; A E Sweany; M R Dobrinska; E A Stein; A C Tate; R D Amin; H Quan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor use in the aged. A review of clinical experience.

Authors:  C J Lintott; R S Scott
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease: how low should we go?

Authors:  H B Rubins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.