Literature DB >> 19855333

Acute and cumulative effects of different times of recovery from whole body vibration exposure on muscle performance.

Marzo E Da Silva-Grigoletto1, Diana M Vaamonde, Eduardo Castillo, Maria S Poblador, Juan M García-Manso, Jose L Lancho.   

Abstract

This experiment was designed to assess the acute (Study I) and cumulative response (Study II) of muscle performance to differing recovery times after exposure to whole body vibration (WBV). All subjects (mean age 19.7 +/- 1.9) were healthy and physically active. In both studies, subjects were exposed to a WBV bout of 6 exposures of 60 seconds each, with frequency of 30 Hz and amplitude of 4 mm. In Study I, subjects (n = 30) underwent 3 trials (1 per day) on different days with a 2-day wash-out period between trials; each trial included either a 1, 2, or 3 minutes of recovery between exposures to WBV. All subjects underwent all trials, which were randomly assigned. Jump ability and muscle power were measured before and after each bout. In Study II, subjects (n = 45) underwent 12 sessions of WBV training in 4 weeks (3 bouts/wk). The subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 3 groups: WBV with 1-minute recovery periods between exposures, WBV with 2-minute recovery periods between exposures, or control group. Jump ability, muscle power, and strength were measured before and after each bout. In the acute study (I), recovery times of 1 and 2 minutes enhanced all measured parameters (p < 0.05), with the 2-minute recovery being more effective. In the long-term study (II), however, although both periods also enhanced the measured parameters (p < 0.05), the 1-minute recovery proved more effective because the response was modified by systematic stimulation. In conclusion, 2-minute recovery periods provided the most effective acute enhancement of muscle activation, whereas the 1-minute recovery provided a more effective cumulative enhancement of muscle power and jump ability.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19855333     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b865d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Does combined strength training and local vibration improve isometric maximum force? A pilot study.

Authors:  Ruben Goebel; Monoem Haddad; Heinz Kleinöder; Zengyuan Yue; Thomas Heinen; Joachim Mester
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

2.  Synchronous whole-body vibration increases VO₂ during and following acute exercise.

Authors:  Tom J Hazell; Peter W R Lemon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Whole body vibration compared to conventional physiotherapy in patients with gonarthrosis: a protocol for a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Gregor Stein; Peter Knoell; Christoph Faymonville; Thomas Kaulhausen; Jan Siewe; Christina Otto; Peer Eysel; Kourosh Zarghooni
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The Effect of Mechanically-Generated Vibrations on the Efficacy of Hemodialysis; Assessment of Patients' Safety: Preliminary Reports.

Authors:  Beata Hornik; Jan Duława; Czesław Marcisz; Wojciech Korchut; Jacek Durmała
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Effects of whole-body vibration training frequency on neuromuscular performance: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Konstantina Karatrantou; Petros Bilios; Gregory C Bogdanis; Panagiotis Ioakimidis; Eleutherios Soulas; Vassilis Gerodimos
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.806

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.