Literature DB >> 19855300

Corneal viscoelasticity differences between diabetic and nondiabetic glaucomatous patients.

Dinorah Piacentini Engel Castro1, Tiago Santos Prata, Verônica Castro Lima, Luis Gustavo Biteli, Carlos Gustavo Vasconcelos de Moraes, Augusto Paranhos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate corneal viscoelasticity in primary open-angle glaucoma patients with and without diabetes mellitus, and to correlate corneal hysteresis (CH) with central corneal thickness (CCT).
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 44 primary open-angle glaucoma patients [19 with diabetes (34 eyes) and 25 without diabetes (40 eyes)] underwent a complete ophthalmic examination. Data collected by masked investigators included CH and CCT using the Ocular Response Analyzer. The mean of 3 measurements was considered for each test. We analyzed the difference between the mean CH in both groups using a general linear model. Partial correlation coefficient between CH and CCT was also calculated.
RESULTS: Mean+/-SD age in diabetic and nondiabetic groups was 67.1+/-8.7 and 65.9+/-15.1, respectively (P=0.77). There was no significant difference regarding mean CCT between diabetic (531.7+/-31.3 mum) and nondiabetic (546.6+/-37.3 mum) groups (P=0.21). Patients with diabetes presented significantly higher CH values than patients without diabetes (9.1+/-1.9 mm Hg vs. 7.8+/-1.7 mm Hg, P=0.04). There was a significant and positive correlation between CH and CCT for all patients (r=0.407, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Primary open-angle glaucoma patients with diabetes have significantly higher CH values than those without diabetes. CH and CCT results were positively correlated. These findings merit further investigation to assess the role of different CH values on glaucoma evaluation and susceptibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19855300     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181b4caa1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  12 in total

1.  Factors associated with topographic changes of the optic nerve head induced by acute intraocular pressure reduction in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  T S Prata; V C Lima; C G Vasconcelos de Moraes; L M Guedes; F P Magalhães; S H Teixeira; R Ritch; A Paranhos
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties, optic nerve head topographic parameters, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in diabetic and non-diabetic primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Serkan Akkaya; Ertuğrul Can; Faruk Öztürk
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Joshua S Hardin; Christopher I Lee; Lydia F Lane; Christian C Hester; R Grant Morshedi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Intraocular pressure and aqueous humor flow during a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp in patients with type 1 diabetes and microvascular complications.

Authors:  James T Lane; Luann Larson; Shan Fan; Julie A Stoner; Eyal Margalit; Carol B Toris
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Association between Glucose Levels and Intraocular Pressure: Pre- and Postprandial Analysis in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients.

Authors:  Luis Guilherme Milesi Pimentel; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Leticia Sant'Ana Cardoso da Silva; Aline Katia Siqueira Souza; Tiago Santos Prata
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Corneal hysteresis and its relevance to glaucoma.

Authors:  Madhvi Deol; David A Taylor; Nathan M Radcliffe
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 7.  A systematic review on the impact of diabetes mellitus on the ocular surface.

Authors:  K Co Shih; K S-L Lam; L Tong
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.097

8.  A comparison of the corneal biomechanics in pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and healthy controls using Corvis® Scheimpflug Technology.

Authors:  Zia S Pradhan; Sujit Deshmukh; Shivani Dixit; Praveena Gudetti; Sathi Devi; Carroll A B Webers; Harsha L Rao
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients.

Authors:  João N Beato; João Esteves-Leandro; David Reis; Manuel Falcão; Vítor Rosas; Ângela Carneiro; Fernando Falcão Reis
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 10.  Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques.

Authors:  Nery Garcia-Porta; Paulo Fernandes; Antonio Queiros; Jose Salgado-Borges; Manuel Parafita-Mato; Jose Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.