Literature DB >> 19855247

Prospective observational study of sirolimus as primary immunosuppression after renal transplantation.

Mark D Pescovitz1, Nosratollah Nezakatgoo, Marc I Lorber, Bjorn Nashan, Helio Tedesco-Silva, Bertram L Kasiske, Federico J Juarez de la Cruz, Graeme Russ, Joseph Campistol, Paul A Keown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Sirolimus (SRL) is an important component of clinical immunosuppression in renal transplantation, but few international studies have examined how this agent is used in routine practice. METHODS.: Within a large prospective pharmacoepidemiological study, 718 de novo renal graft recipients treated with SRL in 65 centers in 10 countries were monitored for up to 5 years posttransplant to compare the principal outcomes and adverse effects by treatment regimen. RESULTS.: Principal treatment regimens were SRL without a calcineurin inhibitor (33%), SRL+cyclosporine A (CsA) (33%), and SRL+tacrolimus (TAC) (34%); 18% of subjects discontinued SRL, 124/718 (17%) developed biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR), 64/718 (9%) lost their graft, and 50/718 (7%) died during follow-up. Calculated creatinine clearance was 66+/-26 mL/min at 2 years. The most common adverse events were hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anemia, urinary tract infections, and diabetes. BCAR was significantly lower in subjects receiving SRL+TAC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, P=0.009) but not significantly lower in those receiving SRL+CsA (HR 0.62, P=0.102) compared with SRL without a calcineurin inhibitor. Graft loss or death did not significantly differ between treatment groups but were associated, respectively, with deceased donor grafts (HR 3.33, P<0.001) and increased age (HR 1.04, P<0.001). No improvement was observed in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil in any treatment combination (HR 0.80, P=0.438 for BCAR; HR 0.93, P=0.849 for graft loss; and HR 0.75, P=0.531 for death). CONCLUSIONS.: SRL is most commonly used in combination with mycophenolate mofetil, CsA, or TAC. BCAR was least common in subjects receiving SRL+TAC, but other outcomes seemed comparable between the treatment regimens in routine practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19855247     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b9d0da

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  3 in total

1.  Ethnicity predicts metabolic syndrome after liver transplant.

Authors:  Claudia A Couto; Claudio L Gelape; Iliana B Doycheva; Jonathan K Kish; Paul Martin; Cynthia Levy
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Inhibitors of mTOR and risks of allograft failure and mortality in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  T Isakova; H Xie; S Messinger; F Cortazar; J J Scialla; G Guerra; G Contreras; D Roth; G W Burke; M Z Molnar; I Mucsi; M Wolf
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  A prospective, multinational pharmacoepidemiological study of clinical conversion to sirolimus immunosuppression after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Bjorn Nashan; Maria Del Carmen Rial; Pablo Raffaele; Graeme Russ; Josep Campistol; Mark D Pescovitz; Paul A Keown
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-08-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.