Literature DB >> 19855170

Evaluation of quadrivalent HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine efficacy against cervical and anogenital disease in subjects with serological evidence of prior vaccine type HPV infection.

Sven-Eric Olsson1, Susanne K Kjaer, Kristján Sigurdsson, Ole-Erik Iversen, Mauricio Hernandez-Avila, Cosette M Wheeler, Gonzalo Perez, Darron R Brown, Laura A Koutsky, Eng Hseon Tay, Patricia García, Kevin A Ault, Suzanne M Garland, Sepp Leodolter, Grace W K Tang, Daron G Ferris, Jorma Paavonen, Matti Lehtinen, Marc Steben, F Xavier Bosch, Joakim Dillner, Elmar A Joura, Slawomir Majewski, Nubia Muñoz, Evan R Myers, Luisa L Villa, Frank J Taddeo, Christine Roberts, Amha Tadesse, Janine Bryan, Roger Maansson, Scott Vuocolo, Teresa M Hesley, Alfred Saah, Eliav Barr, Richard M Haupt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the quadrivalent (types 6/11/16/18) HPV vaccine (GARDASIL/SILGARD) clinical program, 73% of women aged 16-26 were naïve to all vaccine HPV types. In these women, prophylactic administration of the vaccine was highly effective in preventing HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical disease. Of the remaining women, 15% of had evidence of past infection with one or more vaccine HPV types (seropositive and DNA negative) at the time of enrollment. Here we present an analysis in this group of women to determine the efficacy of the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine against new cervical and external anogenital disease related to the same vaccine HPV type which had previously been cleared. Vaccine tolerability in this previously infected population was also assessed.
METHODS: 18,174 women were enrolled into 3 clinical studies. The data presented comprise a subset of these subjects (n = 2,617) who were HPV seropositive and DNA negative at enrollment (for >or=1 vaccine type). In each study, subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine or placebo at day 1, month 2 and month 6 (without knowledge of baseline HPV status). Procedures performed for efficacy data evaluation included detailed genital examination, Pap testing, and collection of cervicovaginal and external genital specimens. Analyses of efficacy were carried out in a population stratified by HPV serology and HPV DNA status at enrollment.
RESULTS: Subjects were followed for an average of 40 months. Seven subjects in the placebo group developed cervical disease, and eight subjects developed external genital disease related to a vaccine HPV type they had previously encountered. No subject receiving HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine developed disease to a vaccine HPV type to which they were seropositive and DNA negative at enrolment.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that natural HPV infection-elicited antibodies may not provide complete protection over time, however the immune response to the HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccine appears to prevent reinfection or reactivation of disease with vaccine HPV types. Vaccine-related adverse experiences were higher among subjects receiving vaccine, mostly due to increased injection site adverse experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19855170     DOI: 10.4161/hv.5.10.9515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin        ISSN: 1554-8600


  75 in total

1.  Randomized trial of HPV4 vaccine assessing the response to HPV4 vaccine in two schedules among Peruvian female sex workers.

Authors:  Brandon Brown; Magaly Blas; Alejandra Cabral; Cesar Carcamo; Patti Gravitt; Neal Halsey
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Review of Gardasil.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Stephen L Vierthaler; Jennifer A Santee
Journal:  J Vaccines Vaccin       Date:  2010-11-23

3.  Human papillomavirus infection and reinfection in adult women: the role of sexual activity and natural immunity.

Authors:  Helen Trottier; Silvaneide Ferreira; Patricia Thomann; Maria C Costa; Joao S Sobrinho; José Carlos M Prado; Thomas E Rohan; Luisa L Villa; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Human papillomavirus disease and vaccines in adolescents.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki
Journal:  Adolesc Med State Art Rev       Date:  2010-08

5.  The role of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination in the prevention of anal cancer in individuals with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) infection.

Authors:  Luis F Barroso
Journal:  Ther Adv Vaccines       Date:  2013-07

6.  Development of chimeric candidate vaccine against HPV18: a proof of concept.

Authors:  Mohammed Wahiduzzaman; Chandresh Sharma; Bindu Dey; Neerja Bhatla; Neeta Singh
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.829

7.  Risk of Delayed Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Inner-City Adolescent Women.

Authors:  Nicolas F Schlecht; Angela Diaz; Viswanathan Shankar; Arnold H Szporn; Maoxin Wu; Anne Nucci-Sack; Ken Peake; Howard D Strickler; Robert D Burk
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Use of human papillomavirus vaccines among young adult women in the United States: an analysis of the 2008 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jasmin A Tiro; Mona Saraiya; Helen Meissner; Nancy Breen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Burden of cervical, anal, and oral HPV in an inner-city pre-vaccine adolescent population.

Authors:  Nicolas F Schlecht; Mary Rojas; Elizabeth Lorde-Rollins; Anne Nucci-Sack; Howard D Strickler; Robert D Burk; Angela Diaz
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.671

10.  Comparison of the immunogenicity of Cervarix® and Gardasil® human papillomavirus vaccines for oncogenic non-vaccine serotypes HPV-31, HPV-33, and HPV-45 in HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  Lars Toft; Martin Tolstrup; Martin Müller; Peter Sehr; Jesper Bonde; Merete Storgaard; Lars Østergaard; Ole S Søgaard
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.