Literature DB >> 19855108

The relative contribution of IVF to the total ongoing pregnancy rate in a subfertile cohort.

M Brandes1, C J C M Hamilton, J P de Bruin, W L D M Nelen, J A M Kremer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although in vitro fertilization (IVF) was introduced more than 30 years ago, its exact role in the spectrum of fertility treatments has never been studied in an unselected population. The aim of this study was to visualize the contribution of IVF to the ongoing pregnancy rates in a cohort of newly referred subfertile couples. MATERIALS: All new subfertile couples (n = 1391) that were referred to our fertility clinic by their general practitioner between January 2002 and December 2006 were included. Fertility care was provided according to the national Dutch fertility guidelines. Data on diagnosis, treatment, mode of conception and pregnancy outcome were documented. If follow-up data were missing, couples were contacted. Cumulative pregnancy curves were constructed for the whole cohort and per diagnostic group.
RESULTS: As per December 2008 the overall ongoing pregnancy rate was 72.0% (n = 1001). Almost half of the pregnancies were conceived spontaneously (45.6%), 19.2% after ovulation induction (OI), 14.0% after intrauterine insemination (IUI) and 21.2% after IVF. A quarter (n = 349) of couples received IVF treatment, which was successful in 60% of cases. IVF had the largest contribution to ongoing pregnancies in patients with 'tubal factor', 'endometriosis' and 'male factor' (45, 45 and 37%, respectively) while in couples with 'unexplained subfertility' and 'ovulation disorders' the contribution to ongoing pregnancies of IVF was limited (13 and 4.5%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of subfertile couples, most pregnancies were conceived spontaneously. The contribution of IVF to ongoing pregnancy rates was comparable to those of OI and IUI. Compared with the pre-IVF era, couples with 'endometriosis', 'tubal factor' and 'male subfertility' have benefited most from its introduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19855108     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  20 in total

1.  Which isolated sperm abnormality is most related to sperm DNA damage in men presenting for infertility evaluation.

Authors:  Stephanie Belloc; Moncef Benkhalifa; Martine Cohen-Bacrie; Alain Dalleac; Hikmat Chahine; Edouard Amar; Armand Zini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Responding to Infertility: Lessons From a Growing Body of Research and Suggested Guidelines for Practice.

Authors:  Karina M Shreffler; Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2017-10

3.  Proteomic Analysis Reveals that Topoisomerase 2A is Associated with Defective Sperm Head Morphology.

Authors:  Jacob Netherton; Rachel A Ogle; Louise Hetherington; Ana Izabel Silva Balbin Villaverde; Hubert Hondermarck; Mark A Baker
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay using bench top flow cytometer for evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation in fertility laboratories: protocol, reference values, and quality control.

Authors:  Rakesh Sharma; Gulfam Ahmad; Sandro C Esteves; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Sexual dysfunction and male infertility.

Authors:  Francesco Lotti; Mario Maggi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Sperm DNA and chromatin integrity in semen samples used for intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Abdullah Alkhayal; Maria San Gabriel; Krista Zeidan; Khalid Alrabeeah; Diana Noel; Rachelle McGraw; Francois Bissonnette; Isaac Jacques Kadoch; Armand Zini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Novel concepts in male factor infertility: clinical and laboratory perspectives.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Nora A Danhof; Raissa I Tjon-Kon-Fat; Marinus Jc Eijkemans; Patrick Mm Bossuyt; Monique H Mochtar; Fulco van der Veen; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Ben Willem J Mol; Madelon van Wely
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-05

Review 9.  Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment.

Authors:  S Gameiro; J Boivin; L Peronace; C M Verhaak
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Sexual orientation of women does not affect outcome of fertility treatment with donated sperm.

Authors:  S Nordqvist; G Sydsjö; C Lampic; H Åkerud; E Elenis; A Skoog Svanberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.