Literature DB >> 19854994

Use of chitosans to modulate ruminal fermentation of a 50:50 forage-to-concentrate diet in sheep.

I Goiri1, L M Oregui, A Garcia-Rodriguez.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of chitosan (CHI) on ruminal and cecal fermentation and on apparent digestibility in sheep. In a first trial, 4 ruminally fistulated sheep fed an alfalfa hay and concentrate diet formulated to meet 1.2 times their maintenance energy requirements were assigned to 2 treatments [no-additive control (CTR), or 136 mg/kg of BW of CHI] for 19 d in a 2 x 2 crossover design. Samples of ruminal fluid and feces were taken for VFA and NH(3)-N concentrations. At the end of each period of the crossover, ruminal fluid was used as inoculum for batch cultures (24 and 96 h), and the effects on rate and extent of gas production and on fermentation variables for starch, cellulose, and the same diet fed to the animals were calculated. In a second trial, 4 sheep fed the alfalfa hay and concentrate diet were assigned to 2 treatments (CTR and CHI), as for the first trial, but this time for 14 d in a 2 x 2 crossover design. Apparent digestibility was studied. In the first trial, in terms of ruminal fermentation, CHI did not affect (P = 0.12) total VFA concentration or acetate proportion, but increased propionate proportion (P = 0.004) and propionate-to-acetate ratio (C3:C2; P = 0.007) and decreased branched-chain VFA (BCVFA) proportion (P = 0.003) and NH(3)-N concentration (P = 0.045). In feces, CHI decreased total VFA concentration (P = 0.01) and acetate (P = 0.045) and butyrate (P = 0.025) proportions, and increased propionate (P = 0.04), valerate (P = 0.01), and BCVFA (P = 0.032) proportions and C3:C2 ratio (P = 0.045). In batch cultures, when starch was used as substrate, CHI decreased acetate proportion (P = 0.016) and methane production (P = 0.03) and increased propionate and valerate proportions and C3:C2 ratio (P < 0.001). When cellulose was used as substrate, CHI decreased in vitro OM digestibility (P = 0.033), total VFA concentration, propionate proportion (P < 0.001), C3:C2 ratio (P = 0.006), methane production (P < 0.001), NH(3)-N concentration (P = 0.019), and gas production rate (P = 0.002), and increased butyrate (P = 0.029) and BCVFA (P = 0.004) proportions and pH (P < 0.001). When the alfalfa hay and concentrate diet was used as substrate, CHI decreased butyrate (P < 0.001) and BCVFA (P = 0.008) proportions, methane (P = 0.005) and asymptotic gas production (P = 0.02), and gas production rate (P = 0.05). In the second trial, CHI decreased NDF apparent digestibility (P = 0.09). In conclusion, CHI shifted ruminal fermentation toward energetically more efficient routes, without reducing OM apparent digestibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19854994     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

1.  Effects of adding mannan oligosaccharides on digestibility and metabolism of nutrients, ruminal fermentation parameters, immunity, and antioxidant capacity of sheep.

Authors:  Chen Zheng; Fadi Li; Zhengli Hao; Ting Liu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects and mode of action of chitosan and ivy fruit saponins on the microbiome, fermentation and methanogenesis in the rumen simulation technique.

Authors:  Alejandro Belanche; Eric Pinloche; David Preskett; C Jamie Newbold
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Effects of chitosan on body weight gain, growth hormone and intestinal morphology in weaned pigs.

Authors:  Yuanqing Xu; Binlin Shi; Sumei Yan; Tiyu Li; Yiwei Guo; Junliang Li
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Effects of low-molecular-weight chitosan on the growth performance, intestinal morphology, barrier function, cytokine expression and antioxidant system of weaned piglets.

Authors:  Shenglan Hu; Yu Wang; Xiaolu Wen; Li Wang; Zongyong Jiang; Chuntian Zheng
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Combining Crude Glycerin with Chitosan Can Manipulate In Vitro Ruminal Efficiency and Inhibit Methane Synthesis.

Authors:  Anuthida Seankamsorn; Anusorn Cherdthong; Metha Wanapat
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Effects of Mannan Oligosaccharides on Gas Emission, Protein and Energy Utilization, and Fasting Metabolism in Sheep.

Authors:  Chen Zheng; Junjun Ma; Ting Liu; Bingdong Wei; Huaming Yang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Chitosan and cottonseed processing method association on carcass traits and meat quality of feedlot lambs.

Authors:  Tamires da Silva Magalhães; Edson Mauro Santos; José Esler de Freitas Júnior; Stefanie Alvarenga Santos; Douglas Dos Santos Pina; Luis Gabriel Alves Cirne; Luis Fernando Batista Pinto; Gerson Barreto Mourão; Franklin Delano Dos Santos Soares; Laudí Cunha Leite; Henry Daniel Ruiz Alba; Manuela Silva Libanio Tosto; Gleidson Giordano Pinto de Carvalho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of Chitosan and Naringin on Enteric Methane Emissions in Crossbred Heifers Fed Tropical Grass.

Authors:  Rafael Jiménez-Ocampo; María Denisse Montoya-Flores; Esperanza Herrera-Torres; Gerardo Pámanes-Carrasco; Jeyder Israel Arceo-Castillo; Sara Stephanie Valencia-Salazar; Jacobo Arango; Carlos Fernando Aguilar-Pérez; Luis Ramírez-Avilés; Francisco Javier Solorio-Sánchez; Ángel Trinidad Piñeiro-Vázquez; Juan Carlos Ku-Vera
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Effects of mannan oligosaccharides on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation and hematological parameters in sheep.

Authors:  Chen Zheng; Juwang Zhou; Yanqin Zeng; Ting Liu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  The Role of Chitosan as a Possible Agent for Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants.

Authors:  Rafael Jiménez-Ocampo; Sara Valencia-Salazar; Carmen Elisa Pinzón-Díaz; Esperanza Herrera-Torres; Carlos Fernando Aguilar-Pérez; Jacobo Arango; Juan Carlos Ku-Vera
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.