Literature DB >> 19854614

Complications of sevoflurane-fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia in pediatric cleft lip and palate surgery: a randomized comparison study.

M Milić1, T Goranović, P Knezević.   

Abstract

Careful choice of anesthetic agents in pediatric patients reduces the frequency of anesthesia-related complications. The frequency and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications of sevoflurane-fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia were compared in 140 consecutive children (aged 3 months to 10 years) undergoing cleft lip and palate repair. Midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), fentanyl (0.005 mg/kg) and vecuronium (0.1mg/kg), and maintained with the same agents according to the defined parametars. Sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane (5-8 vol% and 0.8-1 vol%, respectively) in an oxygen/air mixture and supplemented with fentanyl (0.005 mg/kg). Both groups were comparable in basic demographic data, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. Difficult intubation occurred in 6 of 76 children (midazolam-fentanyl group) and 4 of 64 children (sevoflurane-fentanyl group) (P=0.754). Ventricular extrasystole and bronchospasm occurred in one patient each in the sevoflurane-fentanyl group. Postoperatively, emergence agitation was observed in the sevoflurane-fentanyl group (17 cases; P<0.001); postoperative nausea and vomiting occurred in 2 children (midazolam-fentanyl group) and 3 children (sevoflurane-fentanyl group) (P=0.660). Midazolam-based anesthesia in children is safer than sevoflurane-based anesthesia regarding occurrence of emergence agitation. Copyright 2009 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19854614     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  8 in total

1.  Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on preventing emergence agitation in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for cleft palate repair surgery.

Authors:  Ke Luo; Jun-Mei Xu; Lin Cao; Ju Gao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  The inflammatory response of two different kinds of anesthetics on vascular cognitive impairment rats and the effect on long term cognitive function.

Authors:  Bing Xu; Jia Yang; Fang Kang; Juan Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Dexmedetomidine decreases the emergence agitation in infant patients undergoing cleft palate repair surgery after general anesthesia.

Authors:  Wei Peng; TieJun Zhang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Oral clefting in china over the last decade: 205,679 patients.

Authors:  Rochelle R Kling; Peter J Taub; Xiaoqian Ye; Ethylin Wang Jabs
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-11-07

5.  Comparison of the effects of ketamine and fentanyl-midazolam-medetomidine for sedation of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Henri G M J Bertrand; Yvette C Ellen; Stevie O'Keefe; Paul A Flecknell
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Is the Use of Opioids Safe after Primary Cleft Palate Repair? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Percy Rossell-Perry; Carolina Romero-Narvaez; Ruth Rojas-Sandoval; Paula Gomez-Henao; Maria Pia Delgado-Jimenez; Renato Marca-Ticona
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-01-22

7.  The Comparison of the Efficacy of Early versus Late Administration of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Oral Surgeries: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Afsaneh Sadeghi; Seyed Sajad Razavi; Ahmad Eghbali; Seyed Alireza Mahdavi; Fereshteh Kimia; Ashkan Panah
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2022-01

8.  Comparative Evaluation of the Intranasal Spray Formulation of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Split Mouth Prospective Study.

Authors:  Shashank Hiwarkar; Rajesh Kshirsagar; Vikram Singh; Amod Patankar; Sanjay Chandan; Mukund Rathod; Ajay Mohite
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-12-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.