Clive Seale1. 1. Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom. c.seale@qmul.ac.uk
Abstract
CONTEXT: Continuous deep sedation (CDS) until death can form an effective part of palliative care. In The Netherlands and Belgium, CDS is sometimes regarded as an alternative to euthanasia, and the involvement of palliative care specialists is low. Provision of CDS through opioids alone is not recommended. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the use of CDS in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A survey of 8,857 doctors, of whom 3,733 (42%) replied, with 2,923 reporting on their last patient who died. RESULTS: In total, 18.7% (17.3-20.1) of the doctors attending a dying patient reported the use of CDS. CDS was more likely when patients were younger or were dying of cancer. Specialists in care of the elderly were least likely to report the use of CDS; doctors in other hospital specialties were most likely to report its use. CDS was associated with a higher rate of requests from patients or relatives for a hastened death and with a greater incidence of other end-of-life decisions containing some intent to end life by the doctor. Doctors supporting legalization of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, or who were nonreligious, were more likely to report using CDS. There was palliative care team involvement in half of all CDS cases, and prescription of opioids alone for sedation occurred in one-fifth of the cases but was not reported by specialists in palliative care. CONCLUSION: This study provides baseline data for monitoring future trends in the United Kingdom and highlights the need for a fuller understanding of the circumstances in which CDS occurs in particular care settings. Copyright 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CONTEXT: Continuous deep sedation (CDS) until death can form an effective part of palliative care. In The Netherlands and Belgium, CDS is sometimes regarded as an alternative to euthanasia, and the involvement of palliative care specialists is low. Provision of CDS through opioids alone is not recommended. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the use of CDS in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A survey of 8,857 doctors, of whom 3,733 (42%) replied, with 2,923 reporting on their last patient who died. RESULTS: In total, 18.7% (17.3-20.1) of the doctors attending a dying patient reported the use of CDS. CDS was more likely when patients were younger or were dying of cancer. Specialists in care of the elderly were least likely to report the use of CDS; doctors in other hospital specialties were most likely to report its use. CDS was associated with a higher rate of requests from patients or relatives for a hastened death and with a greater incidence of other end-of-life decisions containing some intent to end life by the doctor. Doctors supporting legalization of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, or who were nonreligious, were more likely to report using CDS. There was palliative care team involvement in half of all CDS cases, and prescription of opioids alone for sedation occurred in one-fifth of the cases but was not reported by specialists in palliative care. CONCLUSION: This study provides baseline data for monitoring future trends in the United Kingdom and highlights the need for a fuller understanding of the circumstances in which CDS occurs in particular care settings. Copyright 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: S M Bruinsma; J Brown; A van der Heide; L Deliens; L Anquinet; S A Payne; J E Seymour; J A C Rietjens Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sarah Ziegler; Margareta Schmid; Matthias Bopp; Georg Bosshard; Milo Alan Puhan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ebun Abarshi; Judith Rietjens; Augusto Caraceni; Sheila Payne; Luc Deliens; Lieve Van Den Block Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Patrick Hoek; Ilse Grandjean; Constans A H H V M Verhagen; Marlies L E A Jansen-Landheer; Henk J Schers; Cilia Galesloot; Kris C P Vissers; Yvonne Engels; Jeroen G J Hasselaar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Livia Anquinet; J Rietjens; A van der Heide; Sophie Bruinsma; Rien Janssens; Luc Deliens; Julia Addington-Hall; W Henry Smithson; Jane Seymour Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 3.894