Literature DB >> 19854488

Impact of prior urethral manipulation on outcome of anastomotic urethroplasty for post-traumatic urethral stricture.

Bhupendra P Singh1, Mukund G Andankar, Sanjaya K Swain, Krishanu Das, Vimal Dassi, Harish K Kaswan, Vipul Agrawal, Hemant R Pathak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of earlier urethral interventions on the outcomes of anastomotic urethroplasty in post-traumatic stricture urethra.
METHODS: From October 1995 to March 2008, a total of 58 patients with post-traumatic posterior urethral stricture underwent anastomotic urethroplasty. Eighteen patients had earlier undergone urethral intervention in the form of urethrotomy (3), endoscopic realignment (7), or open urethroplasty (8). Success was defined as no obstructive urinary symptoms, maximum urine flow rate > or = 15 mL/s, normal urethral imaging and/or urethroscopy, and no need of any intervention in the follow-up period. Patients who met the above objective criteria after needing 1 urethrotomy following urethroplasty were defined to have satisfactory outcome and were included in satisfactory result rate along with patients who had a successful outcome. Results were analyzed using unpaired t test, chi-square test, binary logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log rank test.
RESULTS: Previous interventions in the form of endoscopic realignment or urethroplasty have significant adverse effect on the success rate of subsequent anastomotic urethroplasty for post-traumatic posterior urethral strictures (P <.05). Previous intervention in the form of visual internal urethrotomies (up to 2 times) did not affect the outcome of subsequent anastomotic urethroplasty. Length of stricture and age of patient did not predict the outcome in traumatic posterior urethral strictures in logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Previous failed railroading or urethroplasty significantly decrease the success of subsequent anastomotic urethroplasty. Hence, a primary realignment or urethroplasty should be avoided in suboptimal conditions and the cases of post-traumatic urethral stricture should be referred to centers with such expertise. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19854488     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  A report on the clinical efficacy of a new Bougie-internal urethrectomy.

Authors:  Choe Sung Hyn; Kim Han Jong; Choe Un Chol
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Cost-effective management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries.

Authors:  Niels V Johnsen; David F Penson; W Stuart Reynolds; Douglas F Milam; Roger R Dmochowski; Melissa R Kaufman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury.

Authors:  Niels Vass Johnsen; Rachel A Moses; Sean P Elliott; Alex J Vanni; Nima Baradaran; Garrick Greear; Thomas G Smith; Michael A Granieri; Nejd F Alsikafi; Bradley A Erickson; Jeremy B Myers; Benjamin N Breyer; Jill C Buckley; Lee C Zhao; Bryan B Voelzke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Characteristics of the urethroplasty and our approach-Experience in patients with urethral stricture.

Authors:  Mehmet Akyüz; Emre Tokuç; Emrah Özsoy; Orhan Koca; Hüseyin Kanberoğlu; Metin Öztürk; Ramazan Topaktaş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11-21

5.  Outcome of patients with failed pelvic fracture-associated urethral injury repair: A single centre 10-year experience.

Authors:  Gaurav Garg; Manmeet Singh; Manoj Kumar; Ajay Aggarwal; Siddharth Pandey; Deepanshu Sharma; Satya Narayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11-21

Review 6.  Male urethral strictures and their management.

Authors:  Lindsay A Hampson; Jack W McAninch; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Controversies in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects.

Authors:  Pankaj Mangalkumar Joshi; Vikram Batra; Sanjay B Kulkarni
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-01-01

8.  Current concepts in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects.

Authors:  Ramanitharan Manikandan; Lalgudi N Dorairajan; Santosh Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-07

9.  Factors that influence the outcome of open urethroplasty for pelvis fracture urethral defect (PFUD): an observational study from a single high-volume tertiary care center.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Yu-meng Zhang; Guido Barbagli; Jiong Zhang; Hong Xie; Ying-long Sa; San-bao Jin; Yue-min Xu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Clinical factors that predict successful posterior urethral anastomosis with a gracilis muscle flap.

Authors:  Jin Ho Hwang; Moon Hyung Kang; Young Tae Lee; Dong Soo Park; Seung Ryeol Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.