Literature DB >> 19854004

A socio-psychological investigation into limitations and incentives concerning reporting a clinically suspect situation aimed at improving early detection of classical swine fever outbreaks.

A R W Elbers1, M J Gorgievski-Duijvesteijn, P G van der Velden, W L A Loeffen, K Zarafshani.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify limitations and incentives in reporting clinically suspect situations, possibly caused by classical swine fever (CSF), to veterinary authorities with the ultimate aim to facilitate early detection of CSF outbreaks. Focus group sessions were held with policy makers from the veterinary authorities, and representatives of veterinary practitioners and pig farmer unions. Personal interviews with a small group of pig farmers and practitioners were held to check limitations raised and solutions proposed during the focus group sessions. An electronic questionnaire was mailed to pig farmers and practitioners to investigate perceptions and attitudes with respect to clinically suspect situations possibly caused by CSF. After triangulating the responses of veterinary authorities, veterinary practitioners and farmers, six themes emerged across all groups: (1) lack of knowledge on the early signs of CSF; (2) guilt, shame and prejudice; (3) negative opinion on control measures; (4) dissatisfaction with post-reporting procedures; (5) lack of trust in government bodies; (6) uncertainty and lack of transparency of reporting procedures. The following solutions to facilitate early detection of CSF were put forward: (a) development of a clinical decision-support system for vets and farmers, in order to get faster diagnosis and detection of CSF; (b) possibility to submit blood samples directly to the reference laboratory to exclude CSF in a clinical situation with non-specific clinical signs, without isolation of the farm and free of charge for the individual farmer; (c) decrease social and economic consequences of reporting CSF, for example by improving the public opinion on first reports; (d) better schooling of veterinary officers to deal with emotions and insecurity of farmers in the process after reporting; (e) better communication of rules and regulations, where to report, what will happen next; (f) up-to-date website with information and visual material of the clinical signs of CSF. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19854004     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  7 in total

1.  Proof of Proficiency of Decentralized Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Diagnostics in Germany.

Authors:  Hanna Keck; Bernd Hoffmann; Michael Eschbaumer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.818

2.  Influences of farmer and veterinarian behaviour on emerging disease surveillance in England and Wales.

Authors:  W H Gilbert; B N Häsler; J Rushton
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Descriptive epidemiology of classical swine fever outbreaks in the period 2013-2018 in Colombia.

Authors:  Pilar Pineda; Adriana Deluque; Mario Peña; Olga Lucia Diaz; Alberto Allepuz; Jordi Casal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Non-discriminatory Exclusion Testing as a Tool for the Early Detection of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Incursions.

Authors:  Michael Eschbaumer; Andrea Vögtlin; David J Paton; Jamie L Barnabei; Manuel Jose Sanchez-Vazquez; Edviges Maristela Pituco; Alejandro Mauricio Rivera; Dwane O'Brien; Charles Nfon; Emiliana Brocchi; Labib Bakkali Kassimi; David J Lefebvre; Roberto Navarro López; Eduardo Maradei; Sergio J Duffy; Angelika Loitsch; Kris De Clercq; Donald P King; Stéphan Zientara; Christian Griot; Martin Beer
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-19

5.  Outreach Efforts to Prevent Newcastle Disease Outbreaks in Southern California.

Authors:  Alejandra Figueroa; Esteban Escobedo; Marco Solis; Charlene Rivera; Ann Ikelman; Rodrigo A Gallardo
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 5.818

Review 6.  Interdisciplinary approaches to zoonotic disease.

Authors:  Robin Goodwin; David Schley; Ka-Man Lai; Graziano M Ceddia; Julie Barnett; Nigel Cook
Journal:  Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-12-04

7.  Using mixed methods to investigate factors influencing reporting of livestock diseases: a case study among smallholders in Bolivia.

Authors:  Georgina Limon; Elisa G Lewis; Yu-Mei Chang; Hugo Ruiz; Maria Elba Balanza; Javier Guitian
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 2.670

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.