PURPOSE: To describe the rate of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity after prostate brachytherapy and describe how external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) may influence the association of rectal dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters with rectal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred ten patients with prostate cancer were treated with I-125 brachytherapy alone (n=62, 144 Gy) or as a boost (n=48, 108 Gy) after 45-Gy EBRT. CT-based dosimetry was performed a median of 29 days after implantation. GI toxicity was evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Median followup was 41 months. RESULTS: Eleven patients developed Grade 2+GI toxicity. Men treated with EBRT had an increased risk of GI toxicity, with freedom from Grade 2+ toxicity of 82% vs. 91% for implant alone, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.3044). Of the DVH parameters analyzed, only the rectal volume receiving the prescription dose (rV(100)(%)) was associated with late Grade 2+GI toxicity. Men with rV(100%) >or= 0.05 cc had a 4-year freedom from Grade 2+ toxicity of 77% vs. 100% for those with an rV(100%) <0.05 cc (p=0.0248). However, this relationship was only significant for the subset of patients treated with EBRT, where men with rV(100%) >or= 0.05 cc had a 26% risk of Grade 2+ toxicity compared with 0% for rV(100%) <0.05 cc. Additional DVH parameters, including dose to the hottest 0.1 cc (p=0.0199), 1% (p=0.0086), and 3% (p=0.0043), were also associated with GI toxicity but only in men treated with EBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental EBRT may lower the threshold for rectal toxicity after prostate brachytherapy. Morbidity can be minimized by observing rectal constraints. (c) 2010 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: To describe the rate of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity after prostate brachytherapy and describe how external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) may influence the association of rectal dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters with rectal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred ten patients with prostate cancer were treated with I-125 brachytherapy alone (n=62, 144 Gy) or as a boost (n=48, 108 Gy) after 45-Gy EBRT. CT-based dosimetry was performed a median of 29 days after implantation. GI toxicity was evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Median followup was 41 months. RESULTS: Eleven patients developed Grade 2+GI toxicity. Men treated with EBRT had an increased risk of GI toxicity, with freedom from Grade 2+ toxicity of 82% vs. 91% for implant alone, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.3044). Of the DVH parameters analyzed, only the rectal volume receiving the prescription dose (rV(100)(%)) was associated with late Grade 2+GI toxicity. Men with rV(100%) >or= 0.05 cc had a 4-year freedom from Grade 2+ toxicity of 77% vs. 100% for those with an rV(100%) <0.05 cc (p=0.0248). However, this relationship was only significant for the subset of patients treated with EBRT, where men with rV(100%) >or= 0.05 cc had a 26% risk of Grade 2+ toxicity compared with 0% for rV(100%) <0.05 cc. Additional DVH parameters, including dose to the hottest 0.1 cc (p=0.0199), 1% (p=0.0086), and 3% (p=0.0043), were also associated with GI toxicity but only in men treated with EBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental EBRT may lower the threshold for rectal toxicity after prostate brachytherapy. Morbidity can be minimized by observing rectal constraints. (c) 2010 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: M E Schutzer; P F Orio; M C Biagioli; D A Asher; H Lomas; D Moghanaki Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Achiraya Teyateeti; Craig Grossman; Marisa A Kollmeier; Megan Fiasconaro; Margaret Hopkins; Sean McBride; Daniel Gorovets; Daniel Shasha; Gilad Cohen; Zhigang Zhang; David J Lesser; Antonio Damato; Michael J Zelefsky Journal: BJU Int Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 5.969