Literature DB >> 19853526

Sex differences and hormonal influences on response to mechanical pressure pain in humans.

William J Kowalczyk1, Maria A Sullivan, Suzette M Evans, Adam M Bisaga, Suzanne K Vosburg, Sandra D Comer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Previous studies have demonstrated that sex differences in pain responsivity can be detected using various models of experimentally induced pain. The present study employed the mechanical pressure test in order to examine potential differences in pain report among men, normally menstruating women (NMW), and women taking monophasic oral contraceptives (OCW). Testing occurred during 5 phases of the menstrual cycle (menstrual, follicular, ovulatory, luteal, and late luteal) and all participants completed 10 sessions (2 sessions per phase). Menstrual-cycle phase was estimated for OCW based on their first day of menses. Men were tested at time points that roughly corresponded to the intervals during which the different phases occurred in NMW. During the mechanical pressure test, 4 different weights were placed on the fingers, one at a time, and ratings of pain were recorded for 30 seconds. The statistical decision-making model and a forced-choice procedure were used to analyze the response data. Two variables, based on signal detection theory, were thus generated: P(A), a measure of sensory pain, and B, a measure of response bias. P(A) is believed to be a measure of pain sensitivity while B measures stoicism. NMW tended to report lower P(A) values, indicating reduced ability to discriminate among different stimulus intensities, during the menstrual and late luteal phases compared to the luteal phase. OCW reported lower B values, indicating less stoicism, during the menstrual compared to the follicular and ovulatory phases. Men tended to have significantly lower B values than OCW, but not NMW. These results demonstrate subtle menstrual-cycle effects in NMW and OCW. Sex differences were few, with more group differences and trends emerging between OCW and men, as opposed to men and NMW. PERSPECTIVE: The lack of consistent differences between men and NMW underscores the subtle impact of sex and hormonal changes in pain report. In addition, the data obtained in NMW support the notion that changes in hormone levels during the menstrual cycle can lead to changes in pain responsivity as NMW had trends for better discrimination in menstrual phases when estradiol levels were highest. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19853526      PMCID: PMC6174694          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  44 in total

1.  Effects of oral contraceptives on daily self-ratings of positive and negative affect.

Authors:  K A Oinonen; D Mazmanian
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Daily self-reports on activities, life events, moods, and somatic changes during the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  L A Wilcoxon; S L Schrader; C W Sherif
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  The effects of experimenter gender on pain report in male and female subjects.

Authors:  Fredric M Levine; Laura Lee De Simone
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Effects of oral contraceptives on affective fluctuations associated with the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  K E Paige
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1971 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Timing and severity of symptoms associated with the menstrual cycle in a community-based sample in the Midwestern United States.

Authors:  Patricia M Meaden; S Ann Hartlage; Jennifer Cook-Karr
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Long-term fluctuations of pressure pain thresholds in healthy men, normally menstruating women and oral contraceptive users.

Authors:  H Isselée; A De Laat; K Bogaerts; R Lysens
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.931

7.  Pressure-pain threshold variation in temporomandibular disorder myalgia over the course of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Hans Isselée; Antoon De Laat; Bernard De Mot; Roeland Lysens
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2002

8.  Sex differences in temporal summation of pain and aftersensations following repetitive noxious mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Eleni Sarlani; Edward G Grace; Mark A Reynolds; Joel D Greenspan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Sensitivity to cold pressor pain in dysmenorrheic and non-dysmenorrheic women as a function of menstrual cycle phase.

Authors:  Eleni G Hapidou; Denys De Catanzaro
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Investigation of the interactive effects of gender and psychological factors on pain response.

Authors:  Allan Jones; Robert Zachariae
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2004-09
View more
  18 in total

1.  Mechanical pain sensitivity and the severity of chronic neck pain and disability are not modulated across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Jaclyn E Balter; Jennifer L Molner; Wendy M Kohrt; Katrina S Maluf
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Chronic low back pain, sleep disturbance, and interleukin-6.

Authors:  Kathi L Heffner; Christopher R France; Zina Trost; H Mei Ng; Wilfred R Pigeon
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Sex-Dependent Glial Signaling in Pathological Pain: Distinct Roles of Spinal Microglia and Astrocytes.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Xin Luo; M Yawar Qadri; Temugin Berta; Ru-Rong Ji
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 4.  Determining menstrual phase in human biobehavioral research: A review with recommendations.

Authors:  Alicia M Allen; Aimee L McRae-Clark; Samantha Carlson; Michael E Saladin; Kevin M Gray; Cora Lee Wetherington; Sherry A McKee; Sharon S Allen
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Comparison of the analgesic effects of dronabinol and smoked marijuana in daily marijuana smokers.

Authors:  Ziva D Cooper; Sandra D Comer; Margaret Haney
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Evaluation of potential sex differences in the subjective and analgesic effects of morphine in normal, healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Ziva D Cooper; William J Kowalczyk; Maria A Sullivan; Suzette M Evans; Adam M Bisaga; Suzanne K Vosburg
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Sex differences in measures of central sensitization and pain sensitivity to experimental sleep disruption: implications for sex differences in chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael T Smith; Bethany Remeniuk; Patrick H Finan; Traci J Speed; D Andrew Tompkins; Mercedes Robinson; Kaylin Gonzalez; Martin F Bjurstrom; Michael R Irwin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Implementation of a restrictive blood transfusion protocol in a gynecologic oncology service.

Authors:  Jaron Mark; Sarah Lynam; Kayla Morrell; Kevin Eng; Kristen Starbuck; J Brian Szender; Emese Zsiros; Peter J Frederick
Journal:  Gynecol Reprod Endocrinol       Date:  2019

9.  Subgroups based on thermal and pressure pain thresholds in women with chronic whiplash display differences in clinical presentation - an explorative study.

Authors:  Björn Börsbo; Gunilla M Liedberg; Mia Wallin; Björn Gerdle
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  GCH1-polymorphism and pain sensitivity among women with provoked vestibulodynia.

Authors:  Ulrika Heddini; Nina Bohm-Starke; Alfhild Grönbladh; Fred Nyberg; Kent W Nilsson; Ulrika Johannesson
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.