Literature DB >> 19853476

Sources of variation in estimates of lean body mass by creatinine kinetics and by methods based on body water or body mass index in patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis.

Antonios H Tzamaloukas1, Glen H Murata, Beth Piraino, Dominic S C Raj, Dorothy J VanderJagt, Judith Bernardini, Karen S Servilla, Yijuan Sun, Robert H Glew, Dimitrios G Oreopoulos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We identified factors that account for differences between lean body mass computed from creatinine kinetics (LBM(cr)) and from either body water (LBM(V)) or body mass index (LBM(BMI)) in patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis (CPD).
DESIGN: We compared the LBM(cr) and LBM(V) or LBM(BMI) in hypothetical subjects and actual CPD patients. PATIENTS: We studied 439 CPD patients in Albuquerque, Pittsburgh, and Toronto, with 925 clearance studies. INTERVENTION: Creatinine production was estimated using formulas derived in CPD patients. Body water (V) was estimated from anthropometric formulas. We calculated LBM(BMI) from a formula that estimates body composition based on body mass index. In hypothetical subjects, LBM values were calculated by varying the determinants of body composition (gender, diabetic status, age, weight, and height) one at a time, while the other determinants were kept constant. In actual CPD patients, multiple linear regression and logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with differences in the estimates of LBM (LBM(cr)<LBM(V), or LBM(cr)<LBM(BMI)). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We sought predictors of the differences LBM(V) - LBM(cr) and LBM(BMI) - LBM(cr).
RESULTS: Both LBM(V) (regardless of formula used to estimate V) and LBM(BMI) exceeded LBM(cr) in hypothetical subjects with average body compositions. The sources of differences between LBM estimates in this group involved differences in the coefficients assigned to gender, age, height, weight, presence or absence of diabetes, and serum creatinine concentration. In CPD patients, mean LBM(V) or LBM(BMI) exceeded mean LBM(cr) by 6.2 to 6.9 kg. For example, the LBM(V) obtained from one anthropometric formula was 50.4+/-10.4 kg and the LBM(cr) was 44.1+/-13.6 kg (P < .001), whereas among the 925 clearance studies, only 216 (23.3%) had LBM(cr)>LBM(V). The differences in determinants of body composition between groups with high versus low LBM(cr) were similar in hypothetical and actual CPD patients. Multivariate analysis in actual CPD patients identified serum creatinine, height, age, gender, weight, and body mass index as predictors of the differences LBM(V)-LBM(cr) and LBM(BMI)-LBM(cr).
CONCLUSIONS: Overhydration is not the sole factor accounting for the differences between LBM(cr) and either LBM(V) or LBM(BMI) in CPD patients. These differences also stem from the coefficients assigned to major determinants of body composition by the formulas estimating LBM. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19853476     DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2009.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ren Nutr        ISSN: 1051-2276            Impact factor:   3.655


  4 in total

1.  Waist-to-Hip Ratio, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Death in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Winnie S Su; Catherine M Clase; K Scott Brimble; Peter J Margetts; Trevor J Wilkieson; Azim S Gangji
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-05

2.  Functional impairment is associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Authors:  Maurizio Bossola; Enrico Di Stasio; Manuela Antocicco; Gilda Pepe; Luigi Tazza; Giuseppe Zuccalà; Alice Laudisio
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Advanced wasting in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Zhi Xu; Glen H Murata; Robert H Glew; Yijuan Sun; Darlene Vigil; Karen S Servilla; Antonios H Tzamaloukas
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-06

4.  Lean body mass predicts long-term survival in Chinese patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Jenq-Wen Huang; Yu-Chung Lien; Hon-Yen Wu; Chung-Jen Yen; Chun-Chun Pan; Tsai-Wei Hung; Chi-Ting Su; Chih-Kang Chiang; Hui-Teng Cheng; Kuan-Yu Hung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.