Literature DB >> 19853334

In vivo deep-flexion kinematics in patients with posterior-cruciate retaining and anterior-cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Y Mikashima1, T Tomatsu, M Horikoshi, T Nakatani, S Saito, S Momohara, S A Banks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posterior-cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty designs have long been used with excellent clinical success, but often have shown kinematics and flexion performance that are significantly different from the natural knee. The purpose of this study was to compare deep-flexion knee kinematics in patients with two types of posterior-cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: One group received a traditional curved symmetric articular configuration, and one group received a design incorporating a lateral compartment which constrains the lateral condyle to the antero-posterior center of the tibial plateau in extension, but allows translation in flexion--roughly approximating the role of the anterior cruciate ligament. In vivo kinematics were analyzed using three-dimensional model registration and plain radiographs of kneeling and squatting activities in 20 knees in 18 patients.
FINDINGS: Knees with the anterior cruciate ligament substituting design exhibited greater flexion, femoral antero-posterior translation and tibial internal rotation.
INTERPRETATION: Geometric features intended to improve knee flexion, including greater antero-posterior stability, a more posterior tibial sulcus, and reshaped femoral condyles, do provide measurable and significant differences in deep-flexion knee kinematics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19853334     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  7 in total

1.  How does TKA kinematics vary with transverse plane alignment changes in a contemporary implant?

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Devin J Conner; Rodney Benner; John L Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty during deep knee bending under weight-bearing conditions.

Authors:  Kazuma Futai; Tetsuya Tomita; Takaharu Yamazaki; Masashi Tamaki; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Kinematic analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hua-Wei Liu; Ming Ni; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Xiang Li; Hui Chen; Qiang Zhang; Wei Chai; Yong-Gang Zhou; Ji-Ying Chen; Yu-Liang Liu; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Yan Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Which one restores in vivo knee kinematics effectively-medial or lateral pivot?

Authors:  Sahil Batra; Pon Aravindhan A Sugumar; Vijay Kumar; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-08-21

5.  A short-term radiological and clinical comparison between the bi-cruciate and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty A retrospective case controlled study.

Authors:  S Kalaai; Y F L Bemelmans; M Scholtes; B Boonen; E H van Haaren; M G M Schotanus
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-26

6.  Weight Bearing Activities change the Pivot Position after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Moewis; Hagen Hommel; Adam Trepczynski; Leonie Krahl; Philipp von Roth; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Cruciate Substituting Implants in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander J Volkmar; Robert Elrod; Justin W Vickery; Charlie C Yang; Gregory G Polkowski; J Ryan Martin
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2022-01-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.