Literature DB >> 19852674

The effect of socio-economic status and area of residence on household food variety in Morocco.

Karim Anzid1, Fatima Zahra Elhamdani, Abdellatif Baali, Gilles Boëtsch, Susan Levy-Desroches, Pilar Montero Lôpez, Mohamed Cherkaoui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Morocco, few studies have specifically addressed the association between food variety and household socio-economic status and area of residence. AIM: The study's objective was to obtain a qualitative description of food consumption in samples of Moroccan households and to examine the influence of socio-economic factors and area of residence on their food variety. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A qualitative food frequency questionnaire was administered by adolescent school pupils in their own households between March 2005 and March 2006 in 526 households in the regions of Marrakesh north of the High Atlas range and Ouarzazate to the south. We calculated the Food Variety Index (FVI) based on 183 food items and compared scores for advantaged/disadvantaged and urban/rural households.
RESULTS: Mean FVI scores for all individuals and total food groups differ significantly between the area of residence, urban and peri-urban Marrakesh and urban Ouarzazate having the highest scores. The mean total FVI scores, presented according to the household's socio-economic status from highest to lowest, are 123.8 +/- 17.1 for urban Marrakesh, 107.6 +/- 21.6 for urban Ouarzazate, 92.0 +/- 22.4 for rural Skoura, 110.5 +/- 21.5 for peri-urban Marrakesh and 89.9 +/- 10.8 for rural Iguerferouane (F-test = 26.7, p < 0.001). Advantaged households have significantly greater variety than disadvantaged households for all variables only in the two urban samples. In peri-urban Marrakesh and rural Skoura, there are no significant differences between advantaged and disadvantaged households.
CONCLUSION: In our Moroccan sample, food variety is distributed according to two patterns: One based on area of residence, urban areas having greater variety than rural areas, and the other on socio-economic factors, with advantaged households having higher FVI values but only in urban areas. The limited availability of certain foods and food preferences by the populations mean that not all households are able to diversify their diets.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19852674     DOI: 10.3109/03014460903099996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Biol        ISSN: 0301-4460            Impact factor:   1.533


  3 in total

Review 1.  What are we assessing when we measure food security? A compendium and review of current metrics.

Authors:  Andrew D Jones; Francis M Ngure; Gretel Pelto; Sera L Young
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Effect of body weight and behavioural factors on caries severity in Mexican rural and urban adolescents.

Authors:  Cynthia Lara-Capi; Maria Grazia Cagetti; Fabio Cocco; Peter Lingström; Franklin García-Godoy; Guglielmo Campus
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.607

3.  Validity of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire for middle-aged urban cancer screenees: comparison with 4-day weighed dietary records.

Authors:  Ribeka Takachi; Junko Ishihara; Motoki Iwasaki; Satoko Hosoi; Yuri Ishii; Shizuka Sasazuki; Norie Sawada; Taiki Yamaji; Taichi Shimazu; Manami Inoue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.211

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.