Literature DB >> 19852616

Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster.

Alethea D Wang1, Nathaniel P Sharp, Christine C Spencer, Katherine Tedman-Aucoin, Aneil F Agrawal.   

Abstract

Understanding the nature of selection against deleterious alleles is central to determining how populations are affected by the constant influx of new mutations. Important progress has been made in estimating basic attributes of the distribution of selection coefficients and gene interaction effects (epistasis). Although most aspects of selection are likely to be context dependent, little is known about the effect of stress on selection and epistasis at the level of individual genes, especially in multicellular organisms. Using Drosophila melanogaster, we measure how selection on 20 mutant alleles is affected by direct and indirect genetic factors across two environments. We find that environmental stress increases selection against individual mutations but reduces selection against combinations of mutations (i.e., epistasis becomes more positive). In addition, we find a high incidence of indirect genetic effects whereby the strength of selection against the alleles carried by offspring is dependent on the genotypes of their parents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19852616     DOI: 10.1086/645088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  11 in total

1.  From adaptation to molecular evolution.

Authors:  L-M Chevin; A P Beckerman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Temporal variation in selection accelerates mutational decay by Muller's ratchet.

Authors:  Alison M Wardlaw; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K MacLellan; L Kwan; M C Whitlock; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Sudarshan Chari; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Evolutionary Rescue over a Fitness Landscape.

Authors:  Yoann Anciaux; Luis-Miguel Chevin; Ophélie Ronce; Guillaume Martin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sean C A Clark; Nathaniel P Sharp; Locke Rowe; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dynamic epistasis under varying environmental perturbations.

Authors:  Brandon Barker; Lin Xu; Zhenglong Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fitness effects of new mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii across two stress gradients.

Authors:  S A Kraemer; A D Morgan; R W Ness; P D Keightley; N Colegrave
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Fitness change in relation to mutation number in spontaneous mutation accumulation lines of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Susanne A Kraemer; Katharina B Böndel; Robert W Ness; Peter D Keightley; Nick Colegrave
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Adaptive Evolution under Extreme Genetic Drift in Oxidatively Stressed Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Stephen F Christy; Riana I Wernick; Michael J Lue; Griselda Velasco; Dana K Howe; Dee R Denver; Suzanne Estes
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.