Literature DB >> 19852598

Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.

A Chaiyongsirisern1, A Bakr Rabie, Ricky W K Wong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment effects and long-term stability of the stepwise Herbst appliance and mandibular sagittal split osteotomy in skeletal Class II adult patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised 16 patients in the Herbst group and another 16 patients in the surgery (mandibular sagittal split osteotomy) group. Lateral head films were taken before treatment (T0), after removal of the Herbst appliance/surgery (T1), after the fixed appliance treatment (T2), and 3 years after treatment (T3). All films were analyzed by standard cephalometrics and SO-analysis (analysis of changes in sagittal occlusion).
RESULTS: All Herbst and surgery patients were treated successfully to Class I occlusal relationships with normal overjet and overbite. Both groups showed a significant change in mandibular base advancement (SNB, SNPg, Pg/OLp), which resulted in a decrease in the ANB angle, the Wits appraisal, and facial convexity. However, the surgery group showed larger changes in the parameters mentioned above. In terms of long-term stability, both groups achieved stable results, and no significant difference occurred over time.
CONCLUSION: Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance therapy can be used to treat borderline skeletal Class II adult patients with long-term stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19852598     DOI: 10.2319/110308-556R.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  7 in total

Review 1.  Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Julia von Bremen; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Erhard Gnandt; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  J von Bremen; C Erbe; H Pancherz; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Comparison of surgical and non-surgical orthodontic treatment approaches on occlusal and cephalometric outcomes in patients with Class II Division I malocclusions.

Authors:  Sheila Daniels; Patrick Brady; Arya Daniels; Stacey Howes; Kyungsup Shin; Satheesh Elangovan; Veerasathpurush Allareddy
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  Effects of different surgical techniques and displacement distances on the soft tissue profile via orthodontic-orthognathic treatment of class II and class III malocclusions.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Florian Kötter; Florian Peters; Kristian Kniha; Sachin Chhatwani; Gholamreza Danesh; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Temporary anchorage device usage: a survey among Swiss orthodontists.

Authors:  Goran Markic; Christos Katsaros; Nikolaos Pandis; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.750

Review 7.  Twenty-year clinical experience with fixed functional appliances.

Authors:  Alexandre Moro; Suellen W Borges; Paula Porto Spada; Nathaly D Morais; Gisele Maria Correr; Cauby M Chaves; Lucia H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.