BACKGROUND: Occupational injuries are common among nursing personnel. Most epidemiologic research on nursing aides comes from long-term care settings. Reports from acute care settings often combine data on nurses and aides even though their job requirements and personal characteristics are quite different. Our objective was to assess risk of work-related injuries in an acute care setting while contrasting injuries of aides and nurses. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of aides (n = 1,689) and nurses (n = 5,082) working in acute care at a large healthcare system between 1997 and 2004 were identified via personnel records. Workers' compensation filings were used to ascertain occupational injuries. Poisson regression was used to estimate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Aides had higher overall injury rates than nurses for no-lost work time (RR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3) and lost work time (RR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.1-3.8) injuries. The risk of an injury due to lifting was greater among aides compared to nurses for both non-lost work time and lost work time injuries. Injury rates among aides were particularly high in rehabilitation and orthopedics units. Most of the injuries requiring time away from work for both groups were related to the process of delivering direct patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate the importance of evaluating work-related injuries separately for aides and nurses, given differences in injury risk profiles and injury outcomes. It is particularly important that occupational safety needs of aides be addressed as this occupation experiences significant job growth. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND:Occupational injuries are common among nursing personnel. Most epidemiologic research on nursing aides comes from long-term care settings. Reports from acute care settings often combine data on nurses and aides even though their job requirements and personal characteristics are quite different. Our objective was to assess risk of work-related injuries in an acute care setting while contrasting injuries of aides and nurses. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of aides (n = 1,689) and nurses (n = 5,082) working in acute care at a large healthcare system between 1997 and 2004 were identified via personnel records. Workers' compensation filings were used to ascertain occupational injuries. Poisson regression was used to estimate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Aides had higher overall injury rates than nurses for no-lost work time (RR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3) and lost work time (RR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.1-3.8) injuries. The risk of an injury due to lifting was greater among aides compared to nurses for both non-lost work time and lost work time injuries. Injury rates among aides were particularly high in rehabilitation and orthopedics units. Most of the injuries requiring time away from work for both groups were related to the process of delivering direct patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate the importance of evaluating work-related injuries separately for aides and nurses, given differences in injury risk profiles and injury outcomes. It is particularly important that occupational safety needs of aides be addressed as this occupation experiences significant job growth. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Jack T Dennerlein; Karen Hopcia; Grace Sembajwe; Christopher Kenwood; Anne M Stoddard; T Helene Tveito; Dean M Hashimoto; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Maurizio Macaluso; Lauren A Summerville; Meredith E Tabangin; Nancy M Daraiseh Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: João Amaro; João Magalhães; Margarida Leite; Beatriz Aguiar; Paula Ponte; Joana Barrocas; Pedro Norton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Leslie I Boden; Yolanta V Petrofsky; Karen Hopcia; Gregory R Wagner; Dean Hashimoto Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2014-10-10 Impact factor: 2.214