Literature DB >> 19851869

The relationship between the content and the form of metaphorical statements.

Xu Xu1.   

Abstract

Recent research suggests that the quality of a metaphorical topic-vehicle pairing should be the determinant to the choice of a proper grammatical form, nominal metaphor versus simile. Two studies examined the relationship between the quality of the content of a metaphorical statement and its grammatical form. Study 1 showed that the two grammatical forms did not differ in aptness when the quality of topic-vehicle pairs and the conventionality of vehicles, a factor associated with the quality of metaphorical expressions, were controlled. With an online comprehension measure, Study 2 found that high quality metaphorical pairings were easier to process than low quality metaphorical pairings in both the metaphor form and the simile form. For high quality metaphorical pairings, information related to both the topics and the vehicles was highly activated at an early stage of processing. The relations among factors involved in the interpretive process of metaphorical language are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19851869     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-009-9131-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  5 in total

1.  Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors.

Authors:  P Wolff; D Gentner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Are metaphors elliptical similes?

Authors:  D L Chiappe; J M Kennedy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-07

3.  The career of metaphor.

Authors:  Brian F Bowdle; Dedre Gentner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing.

Authors:  D G Blasko; C M Connine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.