Literature DB >> 19850591

Increased risk of blastogenesis birth defects, arising in the first 4 weeks of pregnancy, after assisted reproductive technologies.

Jane L Halliday1, Obioha C Ukoumunne, H W Gordon Baker, Sue Breheny, Alice M Jaques, Claire Garrett, David Healy, David Amor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reasons for increased birth defect prevalence following in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are largely unknown. Classification of birth defects by pathology rather than organ system, and examination of the role of embryo freezing and thawing may provide clues to the mechanisms involved. This study aimed to investigate these two factors.
METHOD: Data on 6946 IVF or ICSI singleton pregnancies were linked to perinatal outcomes obtained from population-based data sets on births and birth defects occurring between 1991 and 2004 in Victoria, Australia. These were compared with 20,838 outcomes for singleton births in the same population, conceived without IVF or ICSI. Birth defects were classified according to pathogenesis.
RESULTS: Overall, birth defects were increased after IVF or ICSI [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.36; 95% CI: 1.19-1.55] relative to controls. There was no strong evidence of risk differences between IVF and ICSI or between fresh and thawed embryo transfer. However, a specific group, blastogenesis birth defects, were markedly increased [adjusted OR 2.80, 95% CI: 1.63-4.81], with the increase relative to the controls being significant for fresh embryo transfer (adjusted OR 3.65; 95% CI: 2.02-6.59) but not for thawed embryo transfer (adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI: 0.69-3.69).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there is a specific risk of blastogenesis birth defects arising very early in pregnancy after IVF or ICSI and that this risk may be lower with use of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19850591     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  22 in total

Review 1.  Are children born from singleton pregnancies conceived by ICSI at increased risk for congenital malformations when compared to children conceived naturally? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Celeste Lacamara; Carolina Ortega; Sonia Villa; Ricardo Pommer; Juan Enrique Schwarze
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 2.  Outcomes for offspring of men having ICSI for male factor infertility.

Authors:  Jane Halliday
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Risk factors for cryptorchidism.

Authors:  Jason K Gurney; Katherine A McGlynn; James Stanley; Tony Merriman; Virginia Signal; Caroline Shaw; Richard Edwards; Lorenzo Richiardi; John Hutson; Diana Sarfati
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Optimal embryo transfer strategy in poor response may include freeze-all.

Authors:  Murat Berkkanoglu; Kevin Coetzee; Hasan Bulut; Kemal Ozgur
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  DNA mismatch repair and infertility.

Authors:  Sarmistha Mukherjee; Alex D Ridgeway; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 6.  Impact of DNA mismatch repair system alterations on human fertility and related treatments.

Authors:  Min-hao Hu; Shu-yuan Liu; Ning Wang; Yan Wu; Fan Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects Among Liveborn Infants in Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Russell S Kirby; Jennita Reefhuis; Yujia Zhang; Saswati Sunderam; Bruce Cohen; Dana Bernson; Glenn Copeland; Marie A Bailey; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  The risk of birth defects with conception by ART.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Nina E Forestieri; Marilyn L Browne; Sarah C Fisher; Mahsa M Yazdy; Mary K Ethen; Mark A Canfield; Stephanie Watkins; Hazel B Nichols; Leslie V Farland; Sergio Oehninger; Kevin J Doody; Michael L Eisenberg; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Assisted reproductive techniques and the risk of anorectal malformations: a German case-control study.

Authors:  Nadine Zwink; Ekkehart Jenetzky; Eberhard Schmiedeke; Dominik Schmidt; Stefanie Märzheuser; Sabine Grasshoff-Derr; Stefan Holland-Cunz; Sandra Weih; Stuart Hosie; Peter Reifferscheid; Helen Ameis; Christina Kujath; Anke Rissmann; Florian Obermayr; Nicole Schwarzer; Enrika Bartels; Heiko Reutter; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects in a Chinese birth cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Lv; Feiyang Diao; Jiangbo Du; Ting Chen; Qingxia Meng; Xiufeng Ling; Hong Li; Ci Song; Qi Xi; Yangqian Jiang; Yan Xu; Shiyao Tao; Lei Huang; Mingyang Wen; Meijuan Peng; Cong Liu; Qun Lu; Yuanlin He; Yin Yin; Xiaoyu Liu; Bo Xu; Xiumei Han; Kun Zhou; Tao Jiang; Yang Zhao; Hongxia Ma; Guangfu Jin; Yankai Xia; Jiayin Liu; Yuan Lin; Zhibin Hu; Hongbing Shen
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2021-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.