D R van Langenberg1, R B Gearry, H-L Wong, M Ward, P R Gibson. 1. Monash University Department of Medicine, and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nosocomial diarrhoea is common and its investigation carries a significant healthcare cost. This study aimed to determine the utility of faecal lactoferrin (FL), a readily measurable marker of intestinal inflammation, in hospitalized patients with diarrhoea. METHODS: FL was quantified in consecutive faecal samples submitted to a hospital pathology laboratory. Patient data were extracted from hospital records. Receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed in a subset of patients where a decision about low or high likelihood of inflammation could be confidently made. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations with an elevated FL. Cost analyses were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 511 faecal samples from 433 patients (48% male, median age 67 years) was studied. Median FL concentration was 3.4 µg/mL (range 0-288). ROC analysis indicated an optimal cut-off value of 1.25 µg/mL (sensitivity 92%, specificity 97%, negative predictive value 97%) compared with the manufacturer's cut-off of 7.25 µg/mL (60%, 66% and 85% respectively). Multivariate analysis at the lower cut-off minimized potentially confounding variables. Proton pump inhibitor use independently increased (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.8) and current smoking reduced (0.61, 0.38-0.99) the likelihood of an elevated FL. Only one out of 32 bacteriological positive samples would have been missed if FL was instituted as a screening test prior to microbiological assessment, which could have reduced laboratory-related costs by up to 56%. CONCLUSION: In hospitalized patients, a normal FL effectively excludes inflammatory diarrhoea and is proposed as a screening test prior to microbiological assessment of faeces. Prospective evaluation of this approach is warranted.
BACKGROUND:Nosocomial diarrhoea is common and its investigation carries a significant healthcare cost. This study aimed to determine the utility of faecal lactoferrin (FL), a readily measurable marker of intestinal inflammation, in hospitalized patients with diarrhoea. METHODS:FL was quantified in consecutive faecal samples submitted to a hospital pathology laboratory. Patient data were extracted from hospital records. Receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed in a subset of patients where a decision about low or high likelihood of inflammation could be confidently made. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations with an elevated FL. Cost analyses were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 511 faecal samples from 433 patients (48% male, median age 67 years) was studied. Median FL concentration was 3.4 µg/mL (range 0-288). ROC analysis indicated an optimal cut-off value of 1.25 µg/mL (sensitivity 92%, specificity 97%, negative predictive value 97%) compared with the manufacturer's cut-off of 7.25 µg/mL (60%, 66% and 85% respectively). Multivariate analysis at the lower cut-off minimized potentially confounding variables. Proton pump inhibitor use independently increased (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.8) and current smoking reduced (0.61, 0.38-0.99) the likelihood of an elevated FL. Only one out of 32 bacteriological positive samples would have been missed if FL was instituted as a screening test prior to microbiological assessment, which could have reduced laboratory-related costs by up to 56%. CONCLUSION: In hospitalized patients, a normal FL effectively excludes inflammatory diarrhoea and is proposed as a screening test prior to microbiological assessment of faeces. Prospective evaluation of this approach is warranted.
Authors: Andrew Swale; Fabio Miyajima; Paul Roberts; Amanda Hall; Margaret Little; Mike B J Beadsworth; Nick J Beeching; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; Chris M Parry; Munir Pirmohamed Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 3.240