Literature DB >> 19849710

Weak population regulation in ecological time series.

Nicolas L Ziebarth1, Karen C Abbott, Anthony R Ives.   

Abstract

How strongly natural populations are regulated has a long history of debate in ecology. Here, we discuss concepts of population regulation appropriate for stochastic population dynamics. We then analyse two large collections of data sets with autoregressive-moving average (ARMA) models, using model selection techniques to find best-fitting models. We estimated two metrics of population regulation: the characteristic return rate of populations to stationarity and the variability of the stationary distribution (the long-term distribution of population abundance). Empirically, longer time series were more likely to show weakly regulated population dynamics. For data sets of length > or = 20, more than 35% had characteristic return times > 6 years, and more than 29% had stationary distributions whose coefficients of variation were more than two times greater than would be the case if they were maximally regulated. These results suggest that many natural populations are weakly regulated.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19849710     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01393.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  12 in total

1.  Mechanisms of density dependence in ducks: importance of space and per capita food.

Authors:  Petri Nummi; Sari Holopainen; Jukka Rintala; Hannu Pöysä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Density dependence: an ecological Tower of Babel.

Authors:  Salvador Herrando-Pérez; Steven Delean; Barry W Brook; Corey J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of weather and climate on the dynamics of animal population time series.

Authors:  Jonas Knape; Perry de Valpine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Carry-over effects, sequential density dependence and the dynamics of populations in a seasonal environment.

Authors:  Gustavo S Betini; Cortland K Griswold; D Ryan Norris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  An updated perspective on the role of environmental autocorrelation in animal populations.

Authors:  Jake M Ferguson; Felipe Carvalho; Oscar Murillo-García; Mark L Taper; José M Ponciano
Journal:  Theor Ecol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.432

6.  The limits of resilience.

Authors:  Karen B Strier
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Nonlinear population dynamics are ubiquitous in animals.

Authors:  T J Clark; Angela D Luis
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 15.460

8.  A complete record from colonization to extinction reveals density dependence and the importance of winter conditions for a population of the silvery blue, Glaucopsyche lygdamus.

Authors:  Matthew L Forister; James A Fordyce; Andrew C McCall; Arthur M Shapiro
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Spatial climate patterns explain negligible variation in strength of compensatory density feedbacks in birds and mammals.

Authors:  Salvador Herrando-Pérez; Steven Delean; Barry W Brook; Phillip Cassey; Corey J A Bradshaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predicting the process of extinction in experimental microcosms and accounting for interspecific interactions in single-species time series.

Authors:  Jake M Ferguson; José M Ponciano
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 9.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.