BACKGROUND: The present study examined the effects of local heat, global heat, and the interaction between these two endothelial stressors on the blood flow of the skin of the foot in people who are older and who have diabetes. METHODS: Subjects who were older (mean age 64.2 +/- 5.9 years) and were younger (mean age 25.7 +/- 2.9 years) and subjects who had diabetes (mean age 62 +/- 5.9 years, mean duration 13.2 +/- 9.1 years) participated. Subjects were exposed to three global temperatures (16 degrees C, 24 degrees C, and 32 degrees C), and the blood flow response was recorded on the foot with a laser Doppler flow meter for 30 s following applications of local heat (30 degrees C, 33.5 degrees C, and 37 degrees C) using a Peltier junction to clamp the skin for 2 min. RESULTS: All three groups significantly increased blood flow from the 16-24 degrees C environments for the 37 degrees C application of local heat (P(Younger) = 0.02, P(Older) = 0.02, P(Diabetes) = 0.01). Those with diabetes and those who were older only increased blood flow 5% and 6% from the 24-32 degrees C environment, which was not statistically significant (P(Older) = 0.12, P(Diabetes) = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be considerable blood flow reserve in younger subjects to tolerate heat stress. In contrast, older subjects and those with diabetes reach a critical level after which additional heat does not cause in increase in blood flow.
BACKGROUND: The present study examined the effects of local heat, global heat, and the interaction between these two endothelial stressors on the blood flow of the skin of the foot in people who are older and who have diabetes. METHODS: Subjects who were older (mean age 64.2 +/- 5.9 years) and were younger (mean age 25.7 +/- 2.9 years) and subjects who had diabetes (mean age 62 +/- 5.9 years, mean duration 13.2 +/- 9.1 years) participated. Subjects were exposed to three global temperatures (16 degrees C, 24 degrees C, and 32 degrees C), and the blood flow response was recorded on the foot with a laser Doppler flow meter for 30 s following applications of local heat (30 degrees C, 33.5 degrees C, and 37 degrees C) using a Peltier junction to clamp the skin for 2 min. RESULTS: All three groups significantly increased blood flow from the 16-24 degrees C environments for the 37 degrees C application of local heat (P(Younger) = 0.02, P(Older) = 0.02, P(Diabetes) = 0.01). Those with diabetes and those who were older only increased blood flow 5% and 6% from the 24-32 degrees C environment, which was not statistically significant (P(Older) = 0.12, P(Diabetes) = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be considerable blood flow reserve in younger subjects to tolerate heat stress. In contrast, older subjects and those with diabetes reach a critical level after which additional heat does not cause in increase in blood flow.