Literature DB >> 19847883

Evaluation of a dry format reagent alternative for CD4 T-cell enumeration for the FACSCount system: a report on a Moroccan-Canadian study.

Michèle Bergeron1, Tao Ding, Elmir Elharti, Hicham Oumzil, Nadia Soucy, Hicham Harmouche, Saad Chaouch, Rajae El Aouad, Christian Chabot, Francis Mandy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efforts to improve alternative CD4 T-cell counting methods are critical to accelerate the implementation of HIV antiretroviral therapy in resources limited regions. Substituting liquid format reagents to eliminate cold-chain transportation and refrigerated storage with dry format reagents contributes to higher efficiency supply management solution especially for laboratories at remote locations. ReaMetrix has developed dry format reagent kits compatible with the FACSCount system, a dedicated flow cytometer for T-cell subset enumeration widely used in resource limited settings. A dual site collaborative study was designed to compare T-cell subsets using both the new dry format ReaMetrix reagent and the original BD Biosciences liquid reagents.
METHOD: A total of 167 HIV positive samples prepared with Rea T Count (ReaMetrix) and FACSCount (BD Biosciences) reagents were analyzed using FACSCount Systems. To compare both methods, Bland-Altman, Pollock, Scott % similarity and correlation coefficient statistical analysis was applied. Immuno-Trol served as an assay processing control and quality indicator of interlaboratory and intralaboratory variation.
RESULTS: The mean bias and limits of agreement for CD4 T-cell measurements between Rea T Count and FACSCount reagents were -16 cells/microl (-4.6%) and -74 to +43, respectively. The correlation obtained was 0.988 with a similarity of 97.9%. Between laboratory variation data was very good with %CV below 10%.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of dry reagents permits the elimination of cold-chain transportation and the on-site refrigerated storage without compromise to assay quality. The substitution of dry reagents facilitates easier supply management practice that will assure wider access to quality HIV treatment. 2009 Clinical Cytometry Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19847883     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom        ISSN: 1552-4949            Impact factor:   3.058


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of two POC technologies for CD4 count in Morocco.

Authors:  Elmir Elharti; Halima Abbadi; Rajae Bensghir; Kamal Marhoum El Filali; Hajar Elmrabet; Hicham Oumzil
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 2.  CD4 enumeration technologies: a systematic review of test performance for determining eligibility for antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Rosanna W Peeling; Kimberly A Sollis; Sarah Glover; Suzanne M Crowe; Alan L Landay; Ben Cheng; David Barnett; Thomas N Denny; Thomas J Spira; Wendy S Stevens; Siobhan Crowley; Shaffiq Essajee; Marco Vitoria; Nathan Ford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Performance evaluation of the touchscreen-based Muse™ Auto CD4/CD4% single-platform system for CD4 T cell numeration in absolute number and in percentage using blood samples from children and adult patients living in the Central African Republic.

Authors:  Christian Diamant Mossoro-Kpinde; André Kouabosso; Ralph-Sydney Mboumba Bouassa; Jean De Dieu Longo; Edouard Kokanzo; Rosine Féissona; Gérard Grésenguet; Laurent Bélec
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Quality assurance for HIV point-of-care testing and treatment monitoring assays.

Authors:  Adrienne F A Meyers; Paul Sandstrom; Thomas N Denny; Mackenzie Hurlston; Terry B Ball; Rosanna W Peeling; Debrah I Boeras
Journal:  Afr J Lab Med       Date:  2016-10-17

5.  Assessment of two POC technologies for CD4 count in Morocco.

Authors:  Elmir Elharti; Halima Abbadi; Rajae Bensghir; Kamal Marhoum El Filali; Hajar Elmrabet; Hicham Oumzil
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.250

6.  CD4 estimating reagents in dry format are compatible with conventional flow cytometer; FACSCalibur for estimation of absolute CD4 count & percentages.

Authors:  Madhuri Thakar; Bharati Mahajan; Trupti Joshi; Suvarna Sane; Ramesh Paranjape
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.