BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the quality of life (QoL) of patients who had surgery for primary lymphoedema. METHODS: A QoL questionnaire was administered to patients who had surgery between 1981 and 2003 (retrospective group) and between 2003 and 2006 (prospective group). RESULTS: The response rate was 70.3 per cent (109 of 155 patients): 88 patients had limb reduction (78, retrospective; ten, prospective) and 21 had genital reduction (13, retrospective; eight, prospective). Forty-nine patients (63 per cent) who had limb reduction studied retrospectively reported satisfaction with the procedure and most of these would opt for surgery again. In the prospectively studied group, nine of ten patients reported improved limbs, and seven would opt for surgery again. Nineteen of 21 patients who had genital reduction would choose to have surgery again if needed (11 of the retrospectively assessed group and all of the prospective group). Patients' perception that surgery was worthwhile was greater in both of the prospectively assessed groups (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Surgery for severe lymphoedema improved QoL at early assessment. This, however, may not be sustained. Genital reduction appeared to provide greater benefit than limb reduction.
BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the quality of life (QoL) of patients who had surgery for primary lymphoedema. METHODS: A QoL questionnaire was administered to patients who had surgery between 1981 and 2003 (retrospective group) and between 2003 and 2006 (prospective group). RESULTS: The response rate was 70.3 per cent (109 of 155 patients): 88 patients had limb reduction (78, retrospective; ten, prospective) and 21 had genital reduction (13, retrospective; eight, prospective). Forty-nine patients (63 per cent) who had limb reduction studied retrospectively reported satisfaction with the procedure and most of these would opt for surgery again. In the prospectively studied group, nine of ten patients reported improved limbs, and seven would opt for surgery again. Nineteen of 21 patients who had genital reduction would choose to have surgery again if needed (11 of the retrospectively assessed group and all of the prospective group). Patients' perception that surgery was worthwhile was greater in both of the prospectively assessed groups (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Surgery for severe lymphoedema improved QoL at early assessment. This, however, may not be sustained. Genital reduction appeared to provide greater benefit than limb reduction.