Literature DB >> 19847581

The role of polyethylene design on postoperative TKA flexion: an analysis of 1534 cases.

Richard W McCalden1, Steven J MacDonald, Kory D J Charron, Robert B Bourne, Douglas D Naudie.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The range of motion after TKA depends on many patient, surgical technique, and implant factors. Recently, high-flexion designs have been introduced as a means of ensuring or gaining flexion after TKA. We therefore evaluated factors affecting postoperative flexion to determine whether implant design influences longterm flexion. We prospectively collected data on patients receiving a primary Genesis II total knee replacement with a minimum of 1-year followup (mean, 5.4 years; range, 1-13 years). We recorded pre- and postoperative outcome measures, patient demographics, and implant design (cruciate retaining [CR, n = 160], posterior stabilized [PS, n = 1177], high-flex posterior stabilized [HF-PS, n = 197]). Backward stepwise linear regression modeling identified the following factors affecting postoperative flexion: preoperative flexion, gender, body mass index, and implant design. Independent of gender, body mass index, and preoperative flexion, patients who received a HF-PS and PS design implant had a mean of 8 degrees and 5 degrees more flexion, respectively, than those who received a CR implant. Patients with low flexion preoperatively (<100 degrees) were more likely to gain flexion, whereas those with high flexion preoperatively (>120 degrees) were most likely to maintain or lose flexion postoperatively. Controlling for implant design, patients with high flexion preoperatively (>120 degrees) were more likely to gain flexion with the HF-PS design implant (HF-PS = 32.0%; PS = 15.1%; CR = 4.5%). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19847581      PMCID: PMC2795822          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1127-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  38 in total

1.  Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset.

Authors:  J Bellemans; S Banks; J Victor; H Vandenneucker; A Moemans
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-01

2.  A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald; Robert B Bourne; Juliana T Marr
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a randomized study.

Authors:  C R Clark; C H Rorabeck; S MacDonald; D MacDonald; J Swafford; D Cleland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Kawamura; R B Bourne
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden.

Authors:  O Robertsson; M Dunbar; T Pehrsson; K Knutson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-06

6.  Total knee arthroplasty in obese patients: a comparison with a matched control group.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Michael A Mont; Amar D Rajadhyaksha; Lynne C Jones; Gracia Etienne; David S Hungerford
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shigeki Maruyama; Shinichi Yoshiya; Nobuzo Matsui; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR.

Authors:  Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design.

Authors:  Peter G Sultan; Ephrat Most; Steven Schule; Guoan Li; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The outcome of total knee arthroplasty in obese patients.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Michael A Mont; Gracia Etienne; Lynne C Jones; David S Hungerford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  8 in total

1.  Can a high-flexion total knee arthroplasty relieve pain and restore function without premature failure?

Authors:  Ryan D Bauman; Derek R Johnson; Travis J Menge; Raymond H Kim; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Soft-tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty: cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilised, and measured-resection versus gap technique.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Yohei Kawakami; Koji Takayama; Kazunari Ishida; Takehiko Matsushita; Toshihiro Akisue; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Do high flexion posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty designs increase knee flexion? A meta analysis.

Authors:  Takanobu Sumino; Hemanth R Gadikota; Kartik M Varadarajan; Young-Min Kwon; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Ligament-controlled positioning of the knee prosthesis components].

Authors:  K-H Widmer; A Zich
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Clinical evaluation of 292 Genesis II posterior stabilized high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: range of motion and predictors.

Authors:  Mathijs C H W Fuchs; Rob P A Janssen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-08

6.  Radiostereometric Analysis Permits In Vivo Measurement of Very Small Levels of Wear in TKA.

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Jacob Wihlidal; Richard W McCalden; Xunhua Yuan; Steven J MacDonald; Brent A Lanting; Douglas D Naudie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Continuous passive motion and its effects on knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Chun-De Liao; Yi-Ching Huang; Li-Fong Lin; Yen-Shuo Chiu; Jui-Chen Tsai; Chun-Lung Chen; Tsan-Hon Liou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of High-Flexion and Conventional Implants in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhigang Wang; Min Wei; Qiang Zhang; Zhuo Zhang; Yaofei Cui
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-06-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.