BACKGROUND: We previously reported 26 patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CXRT) for T3 rectal cancer and were subsequently offered full-thickness local excision (LE) as an alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME). At nearly 4 years' follow-up, no difference in outcome was observed. This study compares outcomes in a larger cohort of patients and reevaluates the original 26 patients after longer follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent preoperative CXRT (radiation doses of 45, 50.4, or 52.5 Gy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy) followed by surgery for T3 rectal cancer. Forty-seven patients underwent LE (Kraske [n = 6] or transanal excision [n = 41]). 473 patients underwent TME (abdominoperineal resection [n = 141] or low anterior resection [n = 332]). Local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival, and overall survival (OS) rates were compared. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 63 months for the LE group and 59 months for the TME group. Twenty-three LE patients (49%) had a complete response to CXRT, 17 (36%) had microscopic residual disease, and 7 (15%) had gross residual disease, compared with 108 (23%), 89 (19%), and 276 (58%) TME patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 10-year actuarial local recurrence rate for the LE group versus the TME group (10.6% and 7.6%, respectively; P = .52), and no significant difference in DFS, disease-specific survival, or OS rates between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients who demonstrate an excellent response to preoperative CXRT for T3 rectal cancer, full-thickness LE offers comparable local control, DFS, and OS to that achieved with proctectomy and TME.
BACKGROUND: We previously reported 26 patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CXRT) for T3 rectal cancer and were subsequently offered full-thickness local excision (LE) as an alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME). At nearly 4 years' follow-up, no difference in outcome was observed. This study compares outcomes in a larger cohort of patients and reevaluates the original 26 patients after longer follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent preoperative CXRT (radiation doses of 45, 50.4, or 52.5 Gy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy) followed by surgery for T3 rectal cancer. Forty-seven patients underwent LE (Kraske [n = 6] or transanal excision [n = 41]). 473 patients underwent TME (abdominoperineal resection [n = 141] or low anterior resection [n = 332]). Local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival, and overall survival (OS) rates were compared. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 63 months for the LE group and 59 months for the TME group. Twenty-three LEpatients (49%) had a complete response to CXRT, 17 (36%) had microscopic residual disease, and 7 (15%) had gross residual disease, compared with 108 (23%), 89 (19%), and 276 (58%) TMEpatients, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 10-year actuarial local recurrence rate for the LE group versus the TME group (10.6% and 7.6%, respectively; P = .52), and no significant difference in DFS, disease-specific survival, or OS rates between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients who demonstrate an excellent response to preoperative CXRT for T3 rectal cancer, full-thickness LE offers comparable local control, DFS, and OS to that achieved with proctectomy and TME.
Authors: K M Tveit; I Guldvog; S Hagen; E Trondsen; T Harbitz; K Nygaard; J B Nilsen; E Wist; E Hannisdal Journal: Br J Surg Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: David B Chessin; Warren Enker; Alfred M Cohen; Philip B Paty; Martin R Weiser; Leonard Saltz; Bruce D Minsky; W Douglas Wong; Jose G Guillem Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Mark Bonnen; Christopher Crane; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; John Skibber; Marc E Delclos; Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas; Paulo M Hoff; Edward Lin; Cathy Eng; Adrian Wong; Nora A Janjan; Barry W Feig Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C Berger; A de Muret; P Garaud; S Chapet; P Bourlier; A Reynaud-Bougnoux; E Dorval; L de Calan; N Huten; O le Folch; G Calais Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1997-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A Habr-Gama; P M de Souza; U Ribeiro; W Nadalin; R Gansl; A H Sousa; F G Campos; J Gama-Rodrigues Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: C Pericay; X Serra-Aracil; J Ocaña-Rojas; L Mora-López; E Dotor; A Casalots; A Pisa; E Saigí Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 3.405