| Literature DB >> 19846582 |
Lindsay E Rhodes1, Brandi K Freeman, Sungyoung Auh, Angela D Kokkinis, Alison La Pean, Cheunju Chen, Tanya J Lehky, Joseph A Shrader, Ellen W Levy, Michael Harris-Love, Nicholas A Di Prospero, Kenneth H Fischbeck.
Abstract
Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy is an X-linked motor neuron disease caused by a CAG repeat expansion in the androgen receptor gene. To characterize the natural history and define outcome measures for clinical trials, we assessed the clinical history, laboratory findings and muscle strength and function in 57 patients with genetically confirmed disease. We also administered self-assessment questionnaires for activities of daily living, quality of life and erectile function. We found an average delay of over 5 years from onset of weakness to diagnosis. Muscle strength and function correlated directly with serum testosterone levels and inversely with CAG repeat length, age and duration of weakness. Motor unit number estimation was decreased by about half compared to healthy controls. Sensory nerve action potentials were reduced in nearly all subjects. Quantitative muscle assessment and timed 2 min walk may be useful as meaningful indicators of disease status. The direct correlation of testosterone levels with muscle strength indicates that androgens may have a positive effect on muscle function in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy patients, in addition to the toxic effects described in animal models.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19846582 PMCID: PMC2792370 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501
Demographics of SBMA patients
| Mean ± SD (range) | |
|---|---|
| Disease milestones (years) | |
| Age at first muscle weakness | 41 ± 10 (18–64) |
| Age at first presentation for medical care | 44 ± 9 (22–64) |
| Age at clinical diagnosis | 47 ± 9 (29–66) |
| Age at genetic diagnosis | 47 ± 10 (29–75) |
| Age at evaluation for study | 53 ± 10 (37–79) |
| Mean intervals between milestones (years) | |
| First muscle weakness to first medical attention | 2.2 |
| First muscle weakness to clinical diagnosis | 5.5 |
| First muscle weakness to genetic diagnosis | 5.9 |
| First muscle weakness to evaluation for study | 11.8 |
| First medical attention to clinical diagnosis | 3.1 |
| First medical attention to genetic diagnosis | 3.5 |
| Self-assessed activity level | |
| Activity level before disease onset (1–5, 5 high) | 4.6 ± 0.6 (3–5) |
| Current activity level (1–5, 5 high) | 2.5 ± 1.1 (1–5) |
| Genetic | |
| CAG repeat length (number) | 46.7 ± 2.5 (41–53) |
| Family history | |
| Positive | 34 |
| Negative | 16 |
Fifty-seven patients were genotyped, and 45–50 provided information for each of the other demographic variables.
SBMA patient muscle strength and function
| SBMA mean ± SD (range) | SBMA percent of healthy control (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| QMA (kg) | ||
| Shoulder abduction | 8 ± 3 (0–16) | 41 |
| Elbow extension | 7 ± 4 (0–19) | 38 |
| Elbow flexion | 12 ± 6 (1–32) | 48 |
| Wrist flexion | 12 ± 5 (3–26) | 54 |
| Hand grip | 22 ± 10 (6–52) | 53 |
| Pinch | 5 ± 2 (2–12) | 48 |
| | ||
| | ||
| Hip abduction | 16 ± 6 (3–30) | 57 |
| Hip extension | 38 ± 16 (9–93) | 61 |
| Hip flexion | 14 ± 6 (4-33) | 70 |
| Knee extension | 17 ± 11 (3–50) | 40 |
| Ankle dorsiflexion | 13 ± 7 (0–35) | 63 |
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| Timed 2 min walk (m) | ||
| Ambulatory with an assistive device | 66 ± 23 (30–104) | 38 |
| Ambulatory without assistive device | 136 ± 44 (15–208) | 77 |
| |
The 56 SBMA patients assessed by QMA and timed 2 min walk had age and body mass index means of 53 ± 10 years and 28 ± 5 kg/m2, respectively. QMA values shown for the right side only. For the timed 2 min walk, use of an assistive device was optional, and 22 of the 56 subjects chose to do so. The timed walk values are the average of three trials for each subject. Composite and total scores are shown in bold.
Mean ± SD (range) for 10 healthy male volunteers with a mean age of 51 ± 6 years and body mass index of 26 ± 4 kg/m2.
Normative data reported for a 12 person cohort of men and women with a mean age of 68 ± 10 years (Light et al., 1997).
**P < 0.0001 for comparison of SBMA and healthy controls.
Regression analysis of disease measures relative to repeat length, age and testosterone level
| CAG repeat length | Age | Total testosterone | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Muscle function | |||
| QMA weight scaled | −3.50, | −3.27, | 2.88, |
| Timed 2 min walk | −3.16, | −3.50, | 2.30, |
| Neurophysiological | |||
| Peroneal CMAP | −2.72, | ||
| Average SNAP | −4.96, | ||
| MUNE | −2.36, | ||
| Self-assessment | |||
| Total ADL | −2.33, | −2.85, | 3.93, |
| SF-36v2 PCS | 3.98, | ||
| Total IIEF | −2.48, | −3.10, |
Results of multiple linear regression analysis, where the significance of associations of each variable (CAG repeat length, age, and total testosterone) with the respective disease measures (muscle strength and function, neurophysiological measures, and self-assessment questionnaires) are shown, as adjusted for the other two variables. Each cell contains t-test statistics and the corresponding P-value. Only associations that were selected by the stepwise analysis and found to be significant (P < 0.05) are shown.
Self-assessment in SBMA (ranked most to least affected)
| Raw SBMA mean ± SD (range) | SBMA% maximum score | Healthy control% maximum score | SBMA percent of healthy control (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADL | ||||
| Walking (0–4.0) | 2.1 ± 1.1 (1.0–4.0) | 53 | ||
| Handwriting (0–4.0) | 2.4 ± 1.2 (0–4.0) | 60 | ||
| Falling (0–4.0) | 2.6 ± 1.0 (1.0–4.0) | 65 | ||
| Swallowing (0–4.0) | 2.7 ± 0.9 (1.0–4.0) | 68 | ||
| Speech (0–4.0) | 2.8 ± 0.9 (1.0–4.0) | 70 | ||
| Dressing (0–4.0) | 3.1 ± 0.8 (1.0–4.0) | 78 | ||
| Personal hygiene (0–4.0) | 3.1 ± 0.9 (1.0–4.0) | 78 | ||
| Cutting food and handling utensils (0–4.0) | 3.5 ± 0.7 (1.0–4.0) | 88 | ||
| Quality of sitting position (0–4.0) | 3.8 ± 0.4 (2.5–4.0) | 95 | ||
| Quality of life (SF-36v2) | ||||
| Physical functioning (10–30) | 16.5 ± 5.8 (10–30) | 29 | 51 | 57 |
| Role physical (4–20) | 11.4 ± 5.3 (4–20) | 36 | 50 | 71 |
| General health (5–25) | 15.6 ± 5.0 (3–25) | 43 | 50 | 86 |
| Social functioning (2–10) | 7.6 ± 2.4 (2–10) | 44 | 51 | 86 |
| Vitality (4–20) | 11.7 ± 3.5 (4–19) | 45 | 52 | 87 |
| Role emotional (3–15) | 12.6 ± 2.9 (3–15) | 46 | 51 | 90 |
| Bodily pain (2–12) | 6.4 ± 0.8 (4–7) | 48 | 50 | 96 |
| Mental health (5–25) | 19.9 ± 3.6 (8-25) | 49 | 51 | 96 |
| | ||||
| | ||||
| Erectile function (IIEF) | ||||
| Intercourse satisfaction (0–15) | 5.5 ± 5.7 (0–15) | 37 | 70 | 53 |
| Overall satisfaction (2–10) | 5.5 ± 3.0 (2–10) | 44 | 83 | 53 |
| Orgasmic function (0–10) | 5.6 ± 4.4 (0–10) | 56 | 88 | 64 |
| Erectile function (1–30) | 15.2 ± 12.5 (1–30) | 47 | 71 | 66 |
| Sexual desire (2–10) | 5.9 ± 2.4 (2–10) | 49 | 63 | 78 |
| |
a SBMA percentages for ADL (n = 53) are based on the maximum possible score for each component. **P < 0.0001 for comparison between SBMA and an unaffected total score of 36.
b The component scores reported for the SF-36v2 (based on a 4 week-recall period, n = 53) are as defined by Ware et al. (2007) and were normalized using the statistical analysis system coding protocol provided by QualityMetric, Inc. (Lincoln, RI). National normalized scores were obtained from a 1998 survey of U.S. subjects, and the reported averages were calculated for men 35–74 years of age, weighted according to age and sample number (n = 2053–2071) (Ware et al., 2007). **P < 0.0001 for comparison between SBMA and age-matched controls.
c The percent max scores for the IIEF (n = 53) were adjusted for changes in range, i.e. [(raw mean SBMA score – minimum possible score)/(raw score range) x 100%]. Values for healthy controls with a mean age of 55 years (31–86) asymptomatic for erectile dysfunction were obtained from Dinsmore et al. (1999; n = 109).
**P < 0.0001 for comparison between SBMA and an unaffected total score of 36. Composite and total scores are shown in bold.
Serum markers at initial evaluation with percent out of range
| SBMA mean ± SE (range) | Reference | Out of reference range (%) | National estimate for | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [95% mean CI] | range | Low | High | healthy control mean ± SE | |
| Biochemical profile | |||||
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 105 ± 2 (79–189) [101, 109] | 70–115 | 0 | 12 | 109 ± 2 |
| Creatine kinase (U/l) | 1159 ± 114 (118–4434) [935, 1382] | 52–386 | 0 | 88 | |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 204 ± 5 (125–283) [195, 213] | 100–200 | 0 | 53 | 201 ± 1 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 180 ± 19 (37–850) [143, 217] | 160 ± 5 | |||
| High-density lipoprotein (mg/dl) | 51 ± 2 (34–82) [48, 54] | 49 ± 0.4 | |||
| Low-density lipoprotein (mg/dl) | 141 ± 4 (66–224) [133, 150] | 65–129 | 0 | 67 | 120 ± 1 |
| Aspartate aminotransferases (U/l) | 46 ± 2 (24–109) [41, 50] | 6–41 | 0 | 72 | 28 ± 1 |
| Alanine aminotransferases (U/l) | 54 ± 3 (24–111) [49, 60] | 9–34 | 0 | 60 | 30 ± 1 |
| Lactate dehydrogenase (U/l) | 216 ± 8 (125–373) [201, 231] | 113–226 | 0 | 35 | 129 ± 1 |
| Gamma glutamyl transferase (U/l) | 22 ± 2 (7–86) [19, 26] | 11–52 | 11 | 4 | 40 ± 3 |
| Hormonal profile | |||||
| Total testosterone (ng/dl)** | 621 ± 35 (187–1570) [553, 689] | 240–950 | 4 | 9 | 520 ± 4 |
| Free testosterone (ng/dl)** | 14 ± 1 (4–26.7) [12, 15] | 9–30 | 14 | 0 | 10 ± 0.1 |
| Dihydrotestosterone (ng/dl)** | 45 ± 3 (4–157) [38, 51] | 30–85 | 28 | 4 | 26 ± 0.4 |
| Androstenedione (ng/dl)* | 100 ± 9 (41–518) [82, 118] | 40–150 | 0 | 5 | 121 ± 3 |
| Oestradiol (pg/ml)** | 60 ± 4 (25–163) [52, 68] | <20–56 | 0 | 39 | 38 ± 1 |
Fasting glucose and creatine kinase reference ranges were set by the NIH Department of Laboratory Medicine (Bethesda, MD); cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein reference ranges represent desirable and optimal/near optimal ranges, respectively. Serum dihydrotestosterone reference levels are as reported by Esoterix, Inc. (Austin, TX), and serum oestradiol reference ranges are from the NIH Department of Laboratory Medicine (Bethesda, MD). The remaining serum hormonal ranges are as set by the Mayo Medical Laboratories (Rochester, MN). National estimates of means and SEs for the biochemical profile were generated from the 2005–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey using a nationally representative sample of 1480 men with a mean age of 53.2 years (range 37–79). For the hormonal profile, healthy control mean values and SEs were obtained from Wu et al. (1995; n = 1102) and Litman et al. (2007; n = 1612–1880).
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.0001 for comparison of SBMA and healthy controls.
SBMA onset distribution
| Number (%) | |
|---|---|
| Presenting symptoms | |
| Bulbar weakness | 1 (1) |
| Arm weakness | 5 (7) |
| Leg weakness | 16 (23) |
| Breast enlargement | 5 (7) |
| Cramps | 22 (32) |
| Tremor | 16 (23) |
| Other | 4 (6) |
| Area of first muscle weakness | |
| Bulbar | 20 (33) |
| Arm | 10 (17) |
| Leg | 30 (50) |
Presenting symptoms were assessed retrospectively for 57 patients at the time of evaluation. Some patients reported more than one symptom at onset. Numbers in parentheses indicate percent of total symptoms reported. Presenting symptoms noted as “other” include choking, muscle twitching (fasciculations) and musculoskeletal pain.
Neurophysiological studies
| Mean ± SD (range) | Reference range | Abnormally low (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motor nerve conduction (mV) | |||
| Median CMAP | 6.3 ± 3.1 (0.3–13.9) | ≥4.5 mV | 28 |
| Peroneal CMAP | 2.7 ± 2.0 (0–6.7) | ≥2.5 mV | 52 |
| Sensory nerve conduction (µV) | |||
| Median SNAP | 5.4 ± 3.8 (0–23) | ≥15 µV, ≥10 µV over 60 years | 98 |
| Ulnar SNAP | 3.9 ± 3.2 (0–16) | ≥15 µV, ≥10 µV over 60 years | 96 |
| Radial SNAP | 5.1 ± 3.3 (0–13) | ≥15 µV, ≥10 µV over 60 years | 100 |
| Sural SNAP | 1.9 ± 2.1 (0–8) | ≥6 µV, may be absent over 60 years | 94 |
CMAP and SNAP were performed on both sides (n = 54). Only right-sided values were used in the correlation and regression analyses (Tables 7 and 8). For the sural nerve the percent abnormal is for subjects < 60 years of age.
Figure 1The statistical MUNE study was performed on the abductor pollicis brevis of healthy controls (n = 24) and SBMA patients (n = 52). The SBMA subjects tested had a mean median CMAP of 6.3 ± 3.1 mV. The MUNE data from the SBMA patients were adjusted to exclude single motor unit potentials less than 40 µV (Lehky et al., 2009). Control subjects had a mean age of 55 ± 8 years (42–69 years) and a mean median CMAP of 9.7 ± 2.8 mV. The control subjects did not have any small motor unit potential values less than 40 µV, therefore no further adjustment of the MUNE data were needed.
Figure 2(A–D) Correlation of QMA scores with CAG repeat length, age, duration of weakness and total testosterone levels. The values shown are for total weight-scaled QMA (right plus left).