Literature DB >> 19846358

Decompression of the ulnar nerve and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision for cubital tunnel syndrome: comparison with anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve.

Soo Bong Hahn1, Yun Rak Choi, Ho Jung Kang, Eung Shick Kang.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The objective of this study is to compare the results of ulnar nerve decompression and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision (group I) and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve (group II) for cubital tunnel syndrome.
METHODS: Out of 56 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome, 29 were in group I and 27 were in group II. The mean age at the time of the operation was 48.9 years, and the mean follow-up period was 36.4 months. Preoperatively, the neuropathy was graded according to Dellon's criteria.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the results of the two groups according to the modified Bishop's system at the last follow-up. However, four patients showed painful neuroma around the operation scar and one patient in group II had experienced acute deterioration of the symptoms after the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Decompression and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision seems to be more recommendable than anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome in terms of its simplicity and lesser invasiveness. Copyright 2009 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19846358     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

1.  Ulnar Nerve In Situ Decompression versus Transposition for Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph Said; Duncan Van Nest; Carol Foltz; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2018-09-27

2.  Minimal epicondylectomy improves neurologic deficits in moderate to severe cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Kang Wook Kim; Hyuk Jin Lee; Seung Hwan Rhee; Goo Hyun Baek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Minimal-incision in situ ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  Modified simple decompression of ulnar nerve in treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Jamal Gousheh; Ehsan Arasteh
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-01

5.  Safety and Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Decompression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryckie G Wade; Timothy T Griffiths; Robert Flather; Nicholas E Burr; Mario Teo; Grainne Bourke
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-11-02

6.  Ulnar nerve stability-based surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome via a small incision: a comparison with classic anterior nerve transposition.

Authors:  Ho-Jung Kang; Il-Hyun Koh; Yong-Min Chun; Won-Taek Oh; Kwang-Ho Chung; Yun-Rak Choi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Factors Influencing Outcomes after Ulnar Nerve Stability-Based Surgery for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ho Jung Kang; Won Taek Oh; Il Hyun Koh; Sungmin Kim; Yun Rak Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.759

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.