Literature DB >> 19846287

Sister chromatid tension and the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Luigi Nezi1, Andrea Musacchio.   

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is a feedback control system that monitors the state of kinetochore/microtubule attachment during mitosis and halts cell cycle progression until all chromosomes are properly aligned at the metaphase plate. The state of chromosome-microtubule attachment is implicated as a crucial factor in the checkpoint response. On the contrary, lack of tension in the centromere-kinetochore region of sister chromatids has been shown to regulate a pathway of correction of undesired chromosome-microtubule connections, while the presence of tension is believed to promote the stabilization of attachments. We discuss how tension-sensitive phenomena, such as attachment correction and stabilization, relate to the SAC and we speculate on the existence of a single pathway linking error correction and SAC activation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19846287     DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol        ISSN: 0955-0674            Impact factor:   8.382


  80 in total

Review 1.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

2.  Interpolar microtubules are dispensable in fission yeast meiosis II.

Authors:  Takashi Akera; Masamitsu Sato; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  Let's huddle to prevent a muddle: centrosome declustering as an attractive anticancer strategy.

Authors:  A Ogden; P C G Rida; R Aneja
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 4.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  The fate of metaphase kinetochores is weighed in the balance of SUMOylation during S phase.

Authors:  Debaditya Mukhopadhyay; Mary Dasso
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  The Janus soul of centrosomes: a paradoxical role in disease?

Authors:  Maddalena Nano; Renata Basto
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Geometry and force behind kinetochore orientation: lessons from meiosis.

Authors:  Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Kinetochore function and chromosome segregation rely on critical residues in histones H3 and H4 in budding yeast.

Authors:  Tessie M Ng; Tineke L Lenstra; Nicole Duggan; Shuangying Jiang; Steven Ceto; Frank C P Holstege; Junbiao Dai; Jef D Boeke; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Bub1 and BubR1: at the interface between chromosome attachment and the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Sabine Elowe
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.