Literature DB >> 19845981

Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process.

Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah1, Ian Robinson, Sarmad AlShawi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to suggest an acceptable and generic theoretical framework for involving various types of users in the medical device technology (MDT) development process (MDTDP).
METHODS: The authors propose a theoretical framework suggesting different routes, methods and stages through which various types of medical device users can be involved in the MDTDP.
RESULTS: The suggested framework comprises two streams of users' involvement in MDT development, that is, what might be called the end users' stream and the professional users' stream for involving these two groups respectively in the process of developing both simple and more complex and innovative medical devices from conceptualization through to the market deployment. This framework suggests various methods that can be used for users' involvement at different stages of the MDT lifecycle. To illustrate the application of the framework, several MDT development scenarios and device exemplars are presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Development of medical devices from users' perspectives requires not only the involvement of healthcare professionals but also that of the ultimate end users, that is, patients, people with disabilities and/or special needs, and their caregivers. The evidence shows that such end users quickly discard devices that do not fulfill their personal expectations, even though both manufacturers and healthcare professionals may consider those end users' requirements met. Developers and manufacturers need to recognize this potent potential discrepancy between the parties involved, and involve end users and professional healthcare staff directly in the MDTDP. The framework, the authors contend, is a step forward in helping medical device manufacturers plan and make decisions about users' involvement at different stages of the MDTDP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19845981     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309990328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  48 in total

1.  Clinical utility of portable electrophysiology to measure fatigue in treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  B O'Connor; M Markicevic; L Newman; R K Poduval; E Tiernan; E Hanrahan; S Cuffe; R B Reilly; D Walsh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Black box integration of computer-aided diagnosis into PACS deserves a second chance: results of a usability study concerning bone age assessment.

Authors:  Ina Geldermann; Christoph Grouls; Christiane Kuhl; Thomas M Deserno; Cord Spreckelsen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  How should family physicians provide physical activity advice? Qualitative study to inform the design of an e-health intervention.

Authors:  Lindsay Reddeman; Nicole Bourgeois; Emily Nicholas Angl; Mike Heinrich; Leah Hillier; Holly Finn; Beth Bosiak; Payal Agarwal; Robin Mawson; Roni Propp; Noah M Ivers
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Exploring a Need for a Cardiometabolic Disease Staging System as a Computerized Clinical Decision Support Tool: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Aizhan Karabukayeva; Jami L Anderson; Allyson G Hall; Sue S Feldman; Tapan Mehta
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review.

Authors:  Ba' Pham; Hong Anh Thi Tu; Dolly Han; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Fiona Miller; Valeria Rac; Warren Chin; Andrea C Tricco; Mike Paulden; Joanna Bielecki; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-23

6.  Innovative Medical Technology and the Treatment Decision-Making Process in Multiple Sclerosis: A Focus Group Study to Examine Patient Perspectives.

Authors:  L A Visser; M De Mul; W K Redekop
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Mobile alert app to engage community volunteers to help locate missing persons with dementia.

Authors:  Noelannah Neubauer; Christine Daum; Antonio Miguel-Cruz; Lili Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Martin; Julie Barnett
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives.

Authors:  Arthur G Money; Julie Barnett; Jasna Kuljis; Michael P Craven; Jennifer L Martin; Terry Young
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Methods to identify, study and understand end-user participation in HIT development.

Authors:  Anna Marie Høstgaard; Pernille Bertelsen; Christian Nøhr
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.