Literature DB >> 19845846

Sexual satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction: correlates and potential predictors.

Stanley E Althof1, Jacques Buvat, Stephen W Gutkin, Mark Belger, Diane R Stothard, Axel R Fugl-Meyer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sexual satisfaction is an important treatment objective for men with erectile dysfunction (ED). AIMS: To evaluate potential associations between International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) satisfaction at study endpoint and a range of baseline, on-treatment, and endpoint variables.
METHODS: An exploratory analysis was conducted involving 3,935 subjects with ED randomized to on-demand tadalafil (N = 2,824) or placebo (N = 1,111) in randomized, controlled trials across 28 countries. Patients achieving scores > or =16 on IIEF questions 7, 8, 13, and 14 at study endpoint were operationally defined as satisfied (vs. <16, not satisfied). Multivariate logistic regression and other analyses were conducted to ascertain correlates and potential predictors of improvements in the IIEF-erectile function domain (IIEF-EF). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction on the IIEF at study endpoint, on-treatment improvements in IIEF-EF, and endpoint sexual frequency.
RESULTS: Patients who were satisfied with sexual function were on average younger and had less severe ED, a shorter history of the condition, and no history of vascular disorders, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus/insulin use at baseline (P < 0.01 vs. not satisfied for each). Satisfied patients were also more likely to experience a > or =4-point increase on the IIEF-EF domain on treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 22.4; 95% CI = 17.6-28.5; P < 0.0001) or IIEF-EF > or =26 at endpoint (adjusted OR = 41.0; 95% CI = 33.6-50.2; P < 0.0001). Satisfaction emerged as a strong correlate of a > or =4-point increase in the IIEF-EF on treatment; however, as a correlate of endpoint sexual frequency, baseline sexual frequency was stronger than endpoint satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction is associated with certain baseline, on-treatment, and endpoint variables in ED patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings and explore their meaning for female partners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19845846     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01554.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  7 in total

1.  Effects of the start time of glycemic control on erectile function in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

Authors:  O Kwon; S Y Cho; J-S Paick; S W Kim
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  An increased prevalence of medical co-morbidities may underscore future growth in the numbers of men requiring penile prostheses.

Authors:  Jason Akerman; Jason R Kovac
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

3.  Satisfaction guaranteed? How individual, partner, and relationship factors impact sexual satisfaction within partnerships.

Authors:  Julia Velten; Jürgen Margraf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of Sexual Function and Serum Testosterone Levels in Men Opiate Addicts, under Methadone Maintenance Therapy, and Healthy Men.

Authors:  Parvin Agha-Mohammadhasani; Mohammadreza Mokhtaree; Alireza Nazari; Amir Rahnama
Journal:  Addict Health       Date:  2018-04

Review 5.  Assessment of sexual dysfunction in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Dorota Szydlarska; Alicja Jakubowska; Grażyna Rydzewska
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-05

6.  Association Among Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Erectile Function, and Sexual Satisfaction: Results from the Brazil LUTS Study.

Authors:  Cristiano Mendes Gomes; Marcio Augusto Averbeck; Mitti Koyama; Roberto Soler
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 7.  The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhuo Li; Ping Chen; Jun Wang; Qi Mao; Han Xiang; Xiao Wang; Xinghuan Wang; Xinhua Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.