BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several agonists of the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) have been developed for treatment of cognitive deficits. However, agonist efficacy in vivo is difficult to reconcile with rapid alpha7 nAChR desensitization in vitro; and furthermore, the correlation between in vitro receptor efficacy and in vivo behavioural efficacy is not well delineated. The possibility that agonists of this receptor actually function in vivo as inhibitors via desensitization has not been finally resolved. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Two structurally related alpha7 nAChR agonists were characterized and used to assess the degree of efficacy required in a behavioural paradigm. KEY RESULTS: NS6784 activated human and rat alpha7 nAChR with EC(50)s of 0.72 and 0.88 microM, and apparent efficacies of 77 and 97% respectively. NS6740, in contrast, displayed little efficacy at alpha7 nAChR (<2% in oocytes, < or =8% in GH4C1 cells), although its agonist-like properties were revealed by adding a positive allosteric modulator of alpha7 nAChRs or using the slowly desensitizing alpha7V274T receptor. In mouse inhibitory avoidance (IA) memory retention, NS6784 enhanced performance as did the 60% partial agonist A-582941. In contrast, NS6740 did not enhance performance, but blocked effects of A-582941. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Collectively, these findings suggest that a degree of alpha7 nAChR agonist efficacy is required for behavioural effects in the IA paradigm, and that such behavioural efficacy is not due to alpha7 nAChR desensitization. Also, a partial agonist of very low efficacy for this receptor could be used as an inhibitor, in the absence of alpha7 nAChR antagonists with favourable CNS penetration.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several agonists of the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) have been developed for treatment of cognitive deficits. However, agonist efficacy in vivo is difficult to reconcile with rapid alpha7 nAChR desensitization in vitro; and furthermore, the correlation between in vitro receptor efficacy and in vivo behavioural efficacy is not well delineated. The possibility that agonists of this receptor actually function in vivo as inhibitors via desensitization has not been finally resolved. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Two structurally related alpha7 nAChR agonists were characterized and used to assess the degree of efficacy required in a behavioural paradigm. KEY RESULTS:NS6784 activated human and rat alpha7 nAChR with EC(50)s of 0.72 and 0.88 microM, and apparent efficacies of 77 and 97% respectively. NS6740, in contrast, displayed little efficacy at alpha7 nAChR (<2% in oocytes, < or =8% in GH4C1 cells), although its agonist-like properties were revealed by adding a positive allosteric modulator of alpha7 nAChRs or using the slowly desensitizing alpha7V274T receptor. In mouse inhibitory avoidance (IA) memory retention, NS6784 enhanced performance as did the 60% partial agonist A-582941. In contrast, NS6740 did not enhance performance, but blocked effects of A-582941. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Collectively, these findings suggest that a degree of alpha7 nAChR agonist efficacy is required for behavioural effects in the IA paradigm, and that such behavioural efficacy is not due to alpha7 nAChR desensitization. Also, a partial agonist of very low efficacy for this receptor could be used as an inhibitor, in the absence of alpha7 nAChR antagonists with favourable CNS penetration.
Authors: Ann Olincy; Josette G Harris; Lynn L Johnson; Vicki Pender; Susan Kongs; Diana Allensworth; Jamey Ellis; Gary O Zerbe; Sherry Leonard; Karen E Stevens; James O Stevens; Laura Martin; Lawrence E Adler; Ferenc Soti; William R Kem; Robert Freedman Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-06
Authors: Clark A Briggs; Earl J Gubbins; Michael J Marks; C Brent Putman; Rama Thimmapaya; Michael D Meyer; Carol S Surowy Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2006-03-28 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Ian W Jones; Adam Westmacott; Elcie Chan; Roy W Jones; Kelly Dineley; Michael J O'Neill; Susan Wonnacott Journal: J Mol Neurosci Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.444
Authors: Donn G Wishka; Daniel P Walker; Karen M Yates; Steven C Reitz; Shaojuan Jia; Jason K Myers; Kirk L Olson; E Jon Jacobsen; Mark L Wolfe; Vincent E Groppi; Alexander J Hanchar; Bruce A Thornburgh; Luz A Cortes-Burgos; Erik H F Wong; Brian A Staton; Thomas J Raub; Nicole R Higdon; Theron M Wall; Raymond S Hurst; Rodney R Walters; William E Hoffmann; Mihaly Hajos; Stanley Franklin; Galen Carey; Lisa H Gold; Karen K Cook; Steven B Sands; Sabrina X Zhao; John R Soglia; Amit S Kalgutkar; Stephen P Arneric; Bruce N Rogers Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: C A Briggs; M R Schrimpf; D J Anderson; E J Gubbins; J H Grønlien; M Håkerud; H Ween; K Thorin-Hagene; J Malysz; J Li; W H Bunnelle; M Gopalakrishnan; M D Meyer Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2007-12-24 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: David J Anderson; William Bunnelle; Bruce Surber; Jia Du; Carol Surowy; Eliane Tribollet; Anouk Marguerat; Daniel Bertrand; Murali Gopalakrishnan Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Robert S Bitner; William H Bunnelle; David J Anderson; Clark A Briggs; Jerry Buccafusco; Peter Curzon; Michael W Decker; Jennifer M Frost; Jens Halvard Gronlien; Earl Gubbins; Jinhe Li; John Malysz; Stella Markosyan; Kennan Marsh; Michael D Meyer; Arthur L Nikkel; Richard J Radek; Holly M Robb; Daniel Timmermann; James P Sullivan; Murali Gopalakrishnan Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Daniel B Timmermann; Jens Halvard Grønlien; Kathy L Kohlhaas; Elsebet Ø Nielsen; Eva Dam; Tino D Jørgensen; Philip K Ahring; Dan Peters; Dorte Holst; Jeppe K Christensen; Jeppe K Chrsitensen; John Malysz; Clark A Briggs; Murali Gopalakrishnan; Gunnar M Olsen Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2007-07-11 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Nicole A Horenstein; Roger L Papke; Abhijit R Kulkarni; Ganesh U Chaturbhuj; Clare Stokes; Khan Manther; Ganesh A Thakur Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Marta Quadri; Carlo Matera; Almin Silnović; Maria Chiara Pismataro; Nicole A Horenstein; Clare Stokes; Roger L Papke; Clelia Dallanoce Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Roger L Papke; Deniz Bagdas; Abhijit R Kulkarni; Timothy Gould; Shakir D AlSharari; Ganesh A Thakur; M Imad Damaj Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Derk J Hogenkamp; Thomas A Ford-Hutchinson; Wen-Yen Li; Edward R Whittemore; Ryan F Yoshimura; Minhtam B Tran; Timothy B C Johnstone; Gavin D Bascom; Hannah Rollins; Lena Lu; Kelvin W Gee Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 7.446