Literature DB >> 19843807

The effects of ultrasound guidance and neurostimulation on the minimum effective anesthetic volume of mepivacaine 1.5% required to block the sciatic nerve using the subgluteal approach.

Giorgio Danelli1, Daniela Ghisi, Andrea Fanelli, Andrea Ortu, Elisa Moschini, Marco Berti, Stefanie Ziegler, Guido Fanelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that ultrasound (US) guidance may reduce the minimum effective anesthetic volume (MEAV(50)) of 1.5% mepivacaine required to block the sciatic nerve with a subgluteal approach compared with neurostimulation (NS).
METHODS: After premedication and single-injection femoral nerve block, 60 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy were randomly allocated to receive a sciatic nerve block with either NS (n = 30) or US (n = 30). In the US group, the sciatic nerve was localized between the ischial tuberosity and the greater trochanter. In the NS group, the appropriate muscular response (foot plantar flexion or inversion) was elicited (1.5 mA, 2 Hz, 0.1 ms) and maintained to <or=0.5 mA. The volume of the injected local anesthetic was varied for consecutive patients based on an up-and-down method, according to the response of the previous patient. The initial volume was 12 mL. An independent observer evaluated the occurrence of complete loss of pinprick sensation and motor block: positive or negative responses within 20 min after the injection determined a 2-mL decrease or increase for the next patient, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean MEAV(50) for sciatic nerve block was 12 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-23 mL) in Group US and 19 mL (95% CI, 15-23 mL) in Group NS (P < 0.001). The effective dose in 95% of cases was 14 mL (95% CI, 12-17 mL) in Group US and 29 mL (95% CI, 25-40 mL) in Group NS (P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: US provided a 37% reduction in the MEAV(50) of 1.5% mepivacaine required to block the sciatic nerve compared with NS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19843807     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b92372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided technology versus neurostimulation for sciatic nerver block: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiuhong Cao; Xiang Zhao; Jin Xu; Zhengmei Liu; Quan Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

2.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block measured with neurostimulation.

Authors:  Mehmet A Taskaynatan; Ahmet Ozgul; Koray Aydemir; Ozlem Omac Koroglu; Arif K Tan
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  [Differences of analgesic efficacy and complication rates between ultrasound and nervestimulator guided peripheral nerve catheters : Database analysis on patient-relevant target parameters].

Authors:  A Schnabel; B Middendorf; M G Boschin; A Gottschalk; H Van Aken; P K Zahn; E M Pogatzki-Zahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia : placement and dosage of local anesthetics].

Authors:  G Gorsewski; A Dinse-Lambracht; I Tugtekin; A Gauss
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Ultrasound guidance for upper and lower limb blocks.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Anastasia Price; Kevin J Walker; Ken McGrattan; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-11

6.  Ultrasound guidance for deep peripheral nerve blocks: a brief review.

Authors:  Anupama Wadhwa; Sunitha Kanchi Kandadai; Sujittra Tongpresert; Detlef Obal; Ralf Erich Gebhard
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-27

7.  Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of electrophysiologically guided femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoon Seok Youm; Sung Do Cho; Chang Ho Hwang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.