Literature DB >> 1984373

Cardiodynamic effects of propofol in comparison with thiopental: assessment with a transesophageal echocardiographic approach.

J P Mulier1, P F Wouters, H Van Aken, G Vermaut, E Vandermeersch.   

Abstract

In 40 patients, the cardiovascular effects of low- and high-dose propofol anesthesia (single bolus of 1.5 mg/kg in group A, 2.5 mg/kg in group C) were examined and compared with those of low- and high-dose thiopental (4 mg/kg in group B, 6.5 mg/kg in group D) (n = 10 patients per group). After induction of anesthesia with etomidate, all patients were ventilated with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Peripheral arterial systolic blood pressure (SAP) and transesophageal echocardiographic short-axis measurements were used to calculate the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (E) as an index of global myocardial contractility. In all groups SAP decreased significantly below baseline levels for the duration of the measurements (15 min after drug administration), except for the lower dose of thiopental, where SAP returned to baseline values within 10 min. Propofol at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg significantly decreased cardiac output (CO) (from 5.1 +/- 0.25 [mean +/- SEM] to 4.2 +/- 0.23 L/min), stroke volume (SV) (from 64 +/- 3 to 56 +/- 3.6 mL), and the slope of E (from 71 +/- 3.5 to 65 +/- 4.2 mm Hg/mL) until 4 min after drug administration. The higher dose of propofol significantly decreased CO (from 5.1 +/- 0.29 to 4.1 +/- 0.26 L/min), SV (from 64 +/- 3 to 52 +/- 4.6 mL), and the slope of E (from 71 +/- 3.6 to 62 +/- 3.7 mm Hg/mL) until 10 min after drug administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1984373     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199101000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  12 in total

Review 1.  Induction of anaesthesia: a guide to drug choice.

Authors:  Nathalie Nathan; Isabelle Odin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Heterogeneous impact of hypotension on organ perfusion and outcomes: a narrative review.

Authors:  Lingzhong Meng
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Propofol in patients with cardiac disease.

Authors:  N R Searle; P Sahab
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Comparison of the Haemodynamic Effects of Three Different Methods at the Induction of Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Mehmet Levent Uygur; Ayşın Ersoy; Aysel Altan; Zekeriya Ervatan; Sedat Kamalı
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-07-11

Review 5.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Practical treatment recommendations for the safe use of anaesthetics.

Authors:  J W Sear
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Role of Echocardiography in Transcatheter Valvular Heart Disease Interventions.

Authors:  Omar K Khalique; Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Intracoronary propofol does not decrease myocardial contractile function in the dog.

Authors:  S E Belo; R Kolesar; C D Mazer
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 9.  [Drugs for intravenous induction of anesthesia: barbiturates].

Authors:  C Dumps; E Halbeck; D Bolkenius
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Effect of electroacupuncture at Zusanli (ST36) and Sanyinjiao (SP6) acupoints on adrenocortical function in etomidate anesthesia patients.

Authors:  Jian-bo Yu; Shu-an Dong; Li-rong Gong; Man Wang; Rui Mu; Cui Li; Yuan Zhang; Zhao-duan Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.