PURPOSE: Inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) blasts and leukemic stem cells may enhance their sensitivity to cytotoxic agents. We sought to determine the safety and describe the toxicity of this approach by adding the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus (rapamycin), to intensive AML induction chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed a phase I dose escalation study of sirolimus with the chemotherapy regimen MEC (mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine) in patients with relapsed, refractory, or untreated secondary AML. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects received sirolimus and MEC across five dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were irreversible marrow aplasia and multiorgan failure. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sirolimus was determined to be a 12 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 4 mg/d on days 2 to 7, concurrent with MEC chemotherapy. Complete or partial remissions occurred in 6 (22%) of the 27 subjects who completed chemotherapy, including 3 (25%) of the 12 subjects treated at the MTD. At the MTD, measured rapamycin trough levels were within the therapeutic range for solid organ transplantation. However, direct measurement of the mTOR target p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation in marrow blasts from these subjects only showed definite target inhibition in one of five evaluable samples. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus and MEC is an active and feasible regimen. However, as administered in this study, the synergy between MEC and sirolimus was not confirmed. Future studies are planned with different schedules to clarify the clinical and biochemical effects of sirolimus in AML and to determine whether target inhibition predicts chemotherapy response.
PURPOSE: Inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) blasts and leukemic stem cells may enhance their sensitivity to cytotoxic agents. We sought to determine the safety and describe the toxicity of this approach by adding the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus (rapamycin), to intensive AML induction chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed a phase I dose escalation study of sirolimus with the chemotherapy regimen MEC (mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine) in patients with relapsed, refractory, or untreated secondary AML. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects received sirolimus and MEC across five dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were irreversible marrow aplasia and multiorgan failure. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sirolimus was determined to be a 12 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 4 mg/d on days 2 to 7, concurrent with MEC chemotherapy. Complete or partial remissions occurred in 6 (22%) of the 27 subjects who completed chemotherapy, including 3 (25%) of the 12 subjects treated at the MTD. At the MTD, measured rapamycin trough levels were within the therapeutic range for solid organ transplantation. However, direct measurement of the mTOR target p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation in marrow blasts from these subjects only showed definite target inhibition in one of five evaluable samples. CONCLUSIONS:Sirolimus and MEC is an active and feasible regimen. However, as administered in this study, the synergy between MEC and sirolimus was not confirmed. Future studies are planned with different schedules to clarify the clinical and biochemical effects of sirolimus in AML and to determine whether target inhibition predicts chemotherapy response.
Authors: Alexander E Perl; Margaret T Kasner; Doris Shank; Selina M Luger; Martin Carroll Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Susan O'Brien; David A Rizzieri; Norbert Vey; Farhad Ravandi; Utz O Krug; Mikkael A Sekeres; Mike Dennis; Adriano Venditti; Donald A Berry; Tove Flem Jacobsen; Karin Staudacher; Trygve Bergeland; Francis J Giles Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Brian Parkin; Peter Ouillette; Yin Wang; Yan Liu; Whitney Wright; Diane Roulston; Anjali Purkayastha; Amanda Dressel; Judith Karp; Paula Bockenstedt; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Moshe Talpaz; Lisa Kujawski; Yang Liu; Kerby Shedden; Sajid Shakhan; Cheng Li; Harry Erba; Sami N Malek Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kevin R Kelly; Julie H Rowe; Swaminathan Padmanabhan; Steffan T Nawrocki; Jennifer S Carew Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2011-04-17 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Richard M Stone; Barry Moser; Ben Sanford; Philip Schulman; Jonathan E Kolitz; Steven Allen; Wendy Stock; Ilene Galinsky; Ravi Vij; Guido Marcucci; David Hurd; Richard A Larson Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Melissa C Paoloni; Christina Mazcko; Elizabeth Fox; Timothy Fan; Susan Lana; William Kisseberth; David M Vail; Kaylee Nuckolls; Tanasa Osborne; Samuel Yalkowsy; Daniel Gustafson; Yunkai Yu; Liang Cao; Chand Khanna Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ivana Gojo; Alexander Perl; Selina Luger; Maria R Baer; Kelly J Norsworthy; Kenneth S Bauer; Michael Tidwell; Stephanie Fleckinger; Martin Carroll; Edward A Sausville Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 3.850