Literature DB >> 19843663

A phase I study of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor sirolimus and MEC chemotherapy in relapsed and refractory acute myelogenous leukemia.

Alexander E Perl1, Margaret T Kasner, Donald E Tsai, Dan T Vogl, Alison W Loren, Stephen J Schuster, David L Porter, Edward A Stadtmauer, Steven C Goldstein, Noelle V Frey, Sunita D Nasta, Elizabeth O Hexner, Jamil K Dierov, Cezary R Swider, Adam Bagg, Alan M Gewirtz, Martin Carroll, Selina M Luger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) blasts and leukemic stem cells may enhance their sensitivity to cytotoxic agents. We sought to determine the safety and describe the toxicity of this approach by adding the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus (rapamycin), to intensive AML induction chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We performed a phase I dose escalation study of sirolimus with the chemotherapy regimen MEC (mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine) in patients with relapsed, refractory, or untreated secondary AML.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects received sirolimus and MEC across five dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were irreversible marrow aplasia and multiorgan failure. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sirolimus was determined to be a 12 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 4 mg/d on days 2 to 7, concurrent with MEC chemotherapy. Complete or partial remissions occurred in 6 (22%) of the 27 subjects who completed chemotherapy, including 3 (25%) of the 12 subjects treated at the MTD. At the MTD, measured rapamycin trough levels were within the therapeutic range for solid organ transplantation. However, direct measurement of the mTOR target p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation in marrow blasts from these subjects only showed definite target inhibition in one of five evaluable samples.
CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus and MEC is an active and feasible regimen. However, as administered in this study, the synergy between MEC and sirolimus was not confirmed. Future studies are planned with different schedules to clarify the clinical and biochemical effects of sirolimus in AML and to determine whether target inhibition predicts chemotherapy response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19843663     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  49 in total

1.  Single-cell pharmacodynamic monitoring of S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation in AML blasts during a clinical trial combining the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus and intensive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alexander E Perl; Margaret T Kasner; Doris Shank; Selina M Luger; Martin Carroll
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Utility of mTOR inhibition in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Anas Younes; Nousheen Samad
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

3.  Elacytarabine has single-agent activity in patients with advanced acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Susan O'Brien; David A Rizzieri; Norbert Vey; Farhad Ravandi; Utz O Krug; Mikkael A Sekeres; Mike Dennis; Adriano Venditti; Donald A Berry; Tove Flem Jacobsen; Karin Staudacher; Trygve Bergeland; Francis J Giles
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  NF1 inactivation in adult acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Brian Parkin; Peter Ouillette; Yin Wang; Yan Liu; Whitney Wright; Diane Roulston; Anjali Purkayastha; Amanda Dressel; Judith Karp; Paula Bockenstedt; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Moshe Talpaz; Lisa Kujawski; Yang Liu; Kerby Shedden; Sajid Shakhan; Cheng Li; Harry Erba; Sami N Malek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Mammalian target of rapamycin as a target in hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Kevin R Kelly; Julie H Rowe; Swaminathan Padmanabhan; Steffan T Nawrocki; Jennifer S Carew
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  Dual mTORC2/mTORC1 targeting results in potent suppressive effects on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progenitors.

Authors:  Jessica K Altman; Antonella Sassano; Surinder Kaur; Heather Glaser; Barbara Kroczynska; Amanda J Redig; Suzanne Russo; Sharon Barr; Leonidas C Platanias
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  High dose cytarabine plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 19902.

Authors:  Richard M Stone; Barry Moser; Ben Sanford; Philip Schulman; Jonathan E Kolitz; Steven Allen; Wendy Stock; Ilene Galinsky; Ravi Vij; Guido Marcucci; David Hurd; Richard A Larson
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.156

8.  Rapamycin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships in osteosarcoma: a comparative oncology study in dogs.

Authors:  Melissa C Paoloni; Christina Mazcko; Elizabeth Fox; Timothy Fan; Susan Lana; William Kisseberth; David M Vail; Kaylee Nuckolls; Tanasa Osborne; Samuel Yalkowsy; Daniel Gustafson; Yunkai Yu; Liang Cao; Chand Khanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Phase I study of UCN-01 and perifosine in patients with relapsed and refractory acute leukemias and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Ivana Gojo; Alexander Perl; Selina Luger; Maria R Baer; Kelly J Norsworthy; Kenneth S Bauer; Michael Tidwell; Stephanie Fleckinger; Martin Carroll; Edward A Sausville
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Enhancing the effectiveness of nucleoside analogs with mTORC1 blockers to treat acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  Alberto M Martelli; Annalisa Lonetti; Sergio Amadori; James A McCubrey; Francesca Chiarini
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.